Rollheim J, Tvinnereim M, Sitek J, Osnes T
Colosseumklinikken, Oslo, Norway.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2001 Jul;258(5):259-64. doi: 10.1007/s004050100330.
To evaluate repeatability of overnight continuous airway pressure and flow recordings for assessment of obstructive sites and their distribution in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
Open, prospective study of 30 men with sleep-induced obstructive events (apnea and hypopnea).
Repeated ambulatory sleep recordings of airway pressure and flow to assess the localization of sites of obstructive events were compared. Obstructive sites were divided into upper (transpalatal) or lower (subpalatal). The exact distribution of obstructive sites was expressed as percentage upper obstructive events. A cut-off at apnea index (AI) = 5 was used for comparison between frequent and infrequent obstructers.
Eighty-two percent (14/17) of patients with frequent, and 58% of those with infrequent apneic events maintained their predominant site of obstructive events classified as upper (transpalatal) or lower (subpalatal) [72% (21/29) in the entire group]. We found a significant correlation between recordings for the percentage upper apneic (R = 0.54, P = 0.024, n = 17) and hypopneic (R = 0.59, P = 0.012, n = 17) events in patients with frequent, but not in those with infrequent apneic events. Patients who had the vast majority of obstructive events located at a single site were more stable than those with more evenly distributed obstructive events.
Repeatability of sites of obstructive events is influenced by the severity of illness and the degree of upper or lower obstructive predominance. The distribution of sites of obstructive events (classified as mainly "upper"/"lower" or as percent upper obstructive events of all) can be identified with relative confidence in patients who have frequent apneic events (AI > or = 5) or a high degree of upper or lower obstructive predominance and especially in those who have a combination of these two criteria.
评估夜间持续气道压力和流量记录在评估阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者阻塞部位及其分布方面的可重复性。
对30名有睡眠诱发阻塞性事件(呼吸暂停和呼吸不足)的男性进行开放性前瞻性研究。
比较用于评估阻塞性事件部位定位的气道压力和流量的重复动态睡眠记录。阻塞部位分为上气道(经腭)或下气道(腭下)。阻塞部位的确切分布以上气道阻塞事件的百分比表示。采用呼吸暂停指数(AI)=5作为频繁阻塞者和非频繁阻塞者之间比较的界限。
频繁呼吸暂停患者中82%(14/17)以及非频繁呼吸暂停事件患者中58%的患者,其阻塞性事件的主要部位保持为上气道(经腭)或下气道(腭下)分类[全组为72%(21/29)]。我们发现,频繁呼吸暂停患者中,上气道呼吸暂停事件百分比的记录之间存在显著相关性(R = 0.54,P = 0.024,n = 17),呼吸不足事件百分比的记录之间也存在显著相关性(R = 0.59,P = 0.012,n = 17),而非频繁呼吸暂停事件患者则不然。绝大多数阻塞性事件位于单一部位的患者比阻塞性事件分布更均匀的患者更稳定。
阻塞性事件部位的可重复性受疾病严重程度以及上气道或下气道阻塞优势程度的影响。对于频繁呼吸暂停事件(AI≥5)或上气道或下气道阻塞优势程度高的患者,尤其是同时具备这两个标准的患者,可以相对可靠地确定阻塞性事件部位的分布(分类为主要“上气道”/“下气道”或占所有上气道阻塞事件的百分比)。