• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量上颌骨和颧骨以辅助颧种植体植入

Measurement of the maxilla and zygoma as an aid in installing zygomatic implants.

作者信息

Uchida Y, Goto M, Katsuki T, Akiyoshi T

机构信息

Saga Medical School, Nabeshima, Saga, Japan.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Oct;59(10):1193-8. doi: 10.1053/joms.2001.26725.

DOI:10.1053/joms.2001.26725
PMID:11573181
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study used maxillary and zygomatic measurements to obtain information for installing zygomatic implants.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Angular and linear distances between the maxilla and the zygoma were measured in 12 cadavers (n = 22 sides) classified into short and tall groups by height (140 to 159 cm and 160 to 180 cm, respectively).

RESULTS

Based on mean and standard deviation values, the installation angle of zygomatic implants was between 43.8 degrees and 50.6 degrees. The distance between the crest of the maxillary alveolar process near the palate and the jugale (Ju) point of the zygoma was between 44.3 and 54.3 mm. The minimum distance between the most lateral corner of the maxillary sinus and the Ju point was 6.41 mm, and the minimum anteroposterior length of the zygoma was 5.68 mm in the shorter group.

CONCLUSIONS

When the installation angle of zygomatic implants is 43.8 degrees or less, perforation of the maxilla and the zygoma or the infratemporal fossa must be avoided. When the angle is 50.6 degrees or more, perforation of the orbital floor must be avoided. Special attention is needed to ensure osseointegration in shorter patients, because the distance between the most lateral corner of the antrum supporting the zygomatic implant and the Ju point is 10 mm or less. The apex of the implant is 3.75 mm in diameter, and the thickness of the zygoma must be 5.75 mm or more. The threads of the implant must not be exposed from the zygoma in shorter patients.

摘要

目的

本研究采用上颌骨和颧骨测量数据来获取有关植入颧骨种植体的信息。

患者与方法

对12具尸体(n = 22侧)进行上颌骨与颧骨之间的角度和线性距离测量,这些尸体按身高分为矮组和高组(分别为140至159厘米和160至180厘米)。

结果

根据均值和标准差数值,颧骨种植体的植入角度在43.8度至50.6度之间。靠近腭部的上颌牙槽嵴顶与颧骨颧突点(Ju点)之间的距离在44.3至54.3毫米之间。在较矮组中,上颌窦最外侧角与Ju点之间的最小距离为6.41毫米,颧骨的最小前后长度为5.68毫米。

结论

当颧骨种植体的植入角度为43.8度或更小 时,必须避免上颌骨和颧骨或颞下窝穿孔。当角度为50.6度或更大时,必须避免眶底穿孔。对于较矮的患者,需要特别注意确保骨结合,因为支撑颧骨种植体的窦腔最外侧角与Ju点之间的距离为10毫米或更小。种植体顶端直径为3.75毫米,颧骨厚度必须为5.75毫米或更大。在较矮的患者中,种植体螺纹不得从颧骨露出。

相似文献

1
Measurement of the maxilla and zygoma as an aid in installing zygomatic implants.测量上颌骨和颧骨以辅助颧种植体植入
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Oct;59(10):1193-8. doi: 10.1053/joms.2001.26725.
2
Anatomical bases for the insertion of zygomatic implants.颧骨种植体植入的解剖学基础。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008 Dec;10(4):271-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00091.x. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
3
Survival rate of zygomatic implants in atrophic or partially resected maxillae prior to functional loading: a retrospective clinical report.骨萎缩或部分切除上颌骨在功能负载前颧骨种植体的存活率:一项回顾性临床报告
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 May-Jun;21(3):413-20.
4
A study of 25 zygomatic dental implants with 11 to 49 months' follow-up after loading.一项对25颗颧部牙种植体进行的研究,在加载后随访11至49个月。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 May-Jun;21(3):421-5.
5
Rehabilitation of severely resorbed maxillae with zygomatic implants: an evaluation of implant stability, tissue conditions, and patients' opinion before and after treatment.使用颧骨种植体修复严重吸收的上颌骨:治疗前后种植体稳定性、组织状况及患者意见的评估
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 May-Jun;21(3):399-404.
6
Measurement of the zygomatic bone and pilot hole technique for safer insertion of zygomaticus implants.颧弓骨的测量和导孔技术有助于更安全地植入颧突种植体。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jan;45(1):104-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.07.015. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
7
Age-related changes in anatomic bases for the insertion of zygomatic implants.颧种植体植入解剖基础的年龄相关变化。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Nov;43(11):1367-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
8
Zygoma implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation after partial maxillectomy using surgical navigation: a clinical report.使用手术导航的部分上颌骨切除术后颧骨种植体支持的修复重建:一份临床报告
J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Mar;97(3):121-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.01.009.
9
A prospective clinical study on titanium implants in the zygomatic arch for prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with a follow-up of 6 months to 5 years.一项关于颧弓钛种植体用于萎缩性无牙上颌骨修复的前瞻性临床研究,随访时间为6个月至5年。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006;8(3):114-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00009.x.
10
Rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla: a review of 101 zygomatic implants.萎缩性上颌骨的修复:101例颧骨种植体的回顾
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008 Jun 1;13(6):E363-70.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between zygomatic process morphology and maxillary sinus pneumatization.颧骨突形态与上颌窦气化之间的关系。
Saudi Dent J. 2025 Jul 1;37(4-6):25. doi: 10.1007/s44445-025-00031-0.
2
Radioanatomical characteristics of zygoma for planning of quad zygoma implants: a cross sectional study.用于规划四颧骨种植体的颧骨放射解剖学特征:一项横断面研究
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Mar 11;29(1):64. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01361-3.
3
Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes of Zygomatic Implant-Supported Rehabilitation of Atrophic Maxillary Arches - A Prospective Study.
颧种植体支持的萎缩性上颌牙弓修复手术效果评估——一项前瞻性研究
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Jan-Jun;14(1):27-32. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_32_23. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
4
Comparison of stress distribution around all-on-four implants of different angulations and zygoma implants: a 7-model finite element analysis.不同倾斜角度的全口种植体和颧骨种植体周围的应力分布比较:7 模型有限元分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 3;24(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03761-x.
5
Success Rates of Zygomatic Implants for the Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophic Maxilla: A Systematic Review.颧骨种植体修复严重萎缩上颌骨的成功率:一项系统评价
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Aug 12;10(8):151. doi: 10.3390/dj10080151.
6
Micromotion analysis of immediately loaded implants with Titanium and Cobalt-Chrome superstructures. 3D finite element analysis.即刻负载种植体及其钛和钴铬基台的微动分析。三维有限元分析。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021 Aug;7(4):581-590. doi: 10.1002/cre2.365. Epub 2021 May 27.
7
Survival Rate of Zygomatic Implants for Fixed Oral Maxillary Rehabilitations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Outcomes between Zygomatic and Regular Implants.用于口腔上颌骨固定修复的颧骨种植体存活率:一项比较颧骨种植体与常规种植体效果的系统评价和荟萃分析
Dent J (Basel). 2021 Apr 1;9(4):38. doi: 10.3390/dj9040038.
8
Optical Diagnostics of the Maxillary Sinuses by Digital Diaphanoscopy Technology.利用数字透照技术对上颌窦进行光学诊断
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jan 6;11(1):77. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11010077.
9
Three-Dimensional Radiographic Evaluation of the Malar Bone Engagement Available for Ideal Zygomatic Implant Placement.用于理想颧骨种植体植入的颧骨骨结合的三维影像学评估
Methods Protoc. 2020 Jul 22;3(3):52. doi: 10.3390/mps3030052.
10
An Anatomical Study of Maxillary-Zygomatic Complex Using Three-Dimensional Computerized Tomography-Based Zygomatic Implantation.基于三维计算机断层扫描的颧骨种植术中上颌颧骨复合体的解剖学研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8027307. doi: 10.1155/2017/8027307. Epub 2017 Dec 11.