Corneal thickness measurements with contact and noncontact specular microscopic and ultrasonic pachymetry.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the central corneal thickness values in normal and postkeratoplasty corneas with the new Topcon SP-2000P noncontact specular microscopic, contact specular microscopic, and the "common standard" ultrasonic pachymetry.

METHODS

Central corneal thickness was determined in 119 eyes of 81 patients (73 normal eyes of 44 patients and 46 eyes after penetrating keratoplasty) first with a noncontact specular microscopic (Topcon SP-2000P; Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), then an ultrasonic (AL-1000; Tomey, Erlangen, Germany), and finally with a contact specular microscopic (EM-1000; Tomey, Erlangen, Germany) pachymetry two times each by the same investigator.

RESULTS

Reliability of the central corneal measurements was equally high both in normal and in postkeratoplasty corneas with all of the instruments (Cronbach alpha = 0.99). Noncontact specular microscopic corneal thickness determination correlated significantly both with ultrasonic (r =.86, P <.0001) and contact specular microscopic pachymetry (r =.62, P <.0001). The ultrasonic pachymetry correlated well with the Tomey pachymetry (r =.69, P <.0001). The Topcon normal mean central corneal thickness value (542 +/- 46 microm) was 28 +/- 4 microm lower (P <.0001) compared with the ultrasonic data (570 +/- 42 microm), which was 68 +/- 1 microm lower (P <.0001) compared with Tomey thickness (638 +/- 43 microm).

CONCLUSIONS

Central corneal thickness measurements with noncontact specular microscopic, contact specular microscopic, and ultrasonic pachymetry demonstrate that each of the instruments is reliable but cannot be simply used interchangeably.