Whyte R K, Elseed A M, Fraser C B, Shinebourne E A, de Swiet M
Arch Dis Child. 1975 Jul;50(7):542-4. doi: 10.1136/adc.50.7.542.
A recently developed instrument uses the Doppler shift technique to detect vessel wall movement, and it has been suggested that in conjunction with a conventional sphygmomanometer systolic and diastolic blood pressures can be measured. A controlled study was carried out in 20 children recovering from cardiac surgery where direct intra-arterial measurements (one observer) were compared with independent measurements using the Doppler instrument (2 observers). Systolic pressures measured directly and by Doppler technique correlated well and there was no significant difference between intra-arterial and indirect measurements whether the latter were taken by doctors or by nurses. In contrast, direct and indirect diastolic pressure measurements correlated poorly and were significantly overestimated with a mean difference of 6-25 mmHg (range +25 to -10) for doctors, and 4-25 mmHg (range +20 to -10) for nurses. Thus, the instrument adequately measured systolic blood pressure, but in our hands did not give precise measurements for diastolic blood pressure.
最近研发的一种仪器利用多普勒频移技术来检测血管壁运动,有人提出该仪器结合传统血压计可测量收缩压和舒张压。在20名心脏手术后正在康复的儿童中进行了一项对照研究,将直接动脉内测量值(一名观察者)与使用多普勒仪器的独立测量值(两名观察者)进行比较。直接测量和通过多普勒技术测量的收缩压相关性良好,动脉内测量和间接测量之间没有显著差异,无论后者是由医生还是护士进行测量。相比之下,直接和间接舒张压测量的相关性较差,且明显高估,医生测量的平均差异为6 - 25 mmHg(范围为+25至-10),护士测量的平均差异为4 - 25 mmHg(范围为+20至-10)。因此,该仪器能够充分测量收缩压,但在我们手中,它无法精确测量舒张压。