Suppr超能文献

决策与记忆:对尤斯林和奥尔松(1997)感官辨别抽样模型的批判

Decision making and memory: a critique of Juslin and Olsson's (1997) sampling model of sensory discrimination.

作者信息

Vickers D, Pietsch A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.

出版信息

Psychol Rev. 2001 Oct;108(4):789-804. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.789.

Abstract

P. Juslin and H. Olsson's (1997) distinction between Thurstonian and Brunswikian uncertainty is examined and their sampling model of sensory discrimination analyzed as a representative of the class of memoryless decision processes. The separate characteristics and combined behavior of 4 main components of the model are explored: (a) the basic decision process, (b) the assumption of deadline responding, (c) the moving window model of memory, and (d) the hypothesized basis for confidence. It is argued that grafting a moving window memory onto a memoryless decision process has several undesirable consequences. Moreover, the suggested basis for confidence leads to predictions that are counterintuitive and unsupported by empirical evidence. It is concluded that the window-sampling model is a maladapted combination of inappropriate elements, which is implausible as a model of decision making, memory, or confidence, in sensory discrimination.

摘要

对P. 尤斯林和H. 奥尔松(1997年)关于瑟斯顿式不确定性和布伦斯维克式不确定性的区分进行了审视,并分析了他们的感官辨别抽样模型,将其作为无记忆决策过程类别的一个代表。探讨了该模型4个主要组成部分的各自特征和组合行为:(a)基本决策过程,(b)截止期限响应假设,(c)记忆的移动窗口模型,以及(d)假设的信心基础。有人认为,将移动窗口记忆嫁接到无记忆决策过程上会产生一些不良后果。此外,所建议的信心基础导致的预测违反直觉且没有得到经验证据的支持。得出的结论是,窗口抽样模型是不合适元素的不适应组合,作为感官辨别中决策、记忆或信心的模型是不合理的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验