Juslin P, Olsson H
Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Psychol Rev. 1997 Apr;104(2):344-66. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.104.2.344.
As a preliminary step towards the presentation of a model of confidence in sensory discrimination, the authors propose a distinction between 2 different origins of uncertainty named after 2 of the great probabilists in the history of psychology, L.L. Thurstone and Egon Brunswik. The authors review data that suggest that there are empirical as well as conceptual differences between the 2 modes of uncertainty and thus that separate models of confidence are needed in tasks dominated by Thurstonian and Brunswikian uncertainty. The article presents a computational model for 1 class of tasks dominated by Thurstonian uncertainty: sensory discrimination with pair comparisons. The sensory sampling model predicts decisions, confidence assessments, and the complex pattern of response times in simple psychophysical discrimination tasks (J.V. Baranski and W.M. Petrusic, 1994). The model also accounts for the disposition towards underconfidence often observed in sensory discrimination with pair comparisons.
作为提出感官辨别信心模型的初步步骤,作者提出区分两种不同的不确定性来源,这两种来源以心理学史上两位伟大的概率学家L.L.瑟斯顿和埃贡·布伦斯维克命名。作者回顾了相关数据,这些数据表明这两种不确定性模式在经验和概念上存在差异,因此在以瑟斯顿式和布伦斯维克式不确定性为主导的任务中需要单独的信心模型。本文提出了一个计算模型,用于一类以瑟斯顿式不确定性为主导的任务:配对比较的感官辨别。感官抽样模型预测了简单心理物理学辨别任务中的决策、信心评估和复杂的反应时间模式(J.V. 巴兰斯基和W.M. 彼得鲁西克,1994)。该模型还解释了在配对比较的感官辨别中经常观察到的信心不足倾向。