• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

猴子对概念同一性的判断。

Judgment of conceptual identity in monkeys.

作者信息

Bovet D, Vauclair J

机构信息

University of Provence, Aix-en-Provence, France.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Sep;8(3):470-5. doi: 10.3758/bf03196181.

DOI:10.3758/bf03196181
PMID:11700897
Abstract

Baboons (Papio anubis) were tested on categorization tasks at two different conceptual levels. The monkeys showed their ability (1) to judge as identical or different the objects belonging to two categories, on a perceptual basis, and (2) to perform a judgment of conceptual identity-that is, to use the same/different relation between two previously learned categories. This latter experiment represents the first demonstration of judgment of conceptual identity in a monkey species.

摘要

对狒狒(埃及狒狒)进行了两个不同概念层次的分类任务测试。这些猴子表现出它们有能力:(1)在感知基础上判断属于两个类别的物体是相同还是不同;(2)进行概念同一性判断,即利用两个先前学习的类别之间的相同/不同关系。后一个实验是首次在猴类中证明概念同一性判断。

相似文献

1
Judgment of conceptual identity in monkeys.猴子对概念同一性的判断。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Sep;8(3):470-5. doi: 10.3758/bf03196181.
2
Same-different conceptualization by baboons (Papio papio): the role of entropy.豚尾狒狒(巴氏狒狒)的异同概念化:熵的作用。
J Comp Psychol. 2001 Mar;115(1):42-52. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.115.1.42.
3
Generalized relational matching by guinea baboons (Papio papio) in two-by-two-item analogy problems.豚尾猴(Papio papio)在二对二项目类比问题中进行广义关系匹配。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Oct;22(10):1304-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797611422916. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
4
Discriminating the relation between relations: the role of entropy in abstract conceptualization by baboons (Papio papio) and humans (Homo sapiens).区分关系之间的关系:熵在狒狒(豚尾狒狒)和人类(智人)抽象概念形成中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2001 Oct;27(4):316-28.
5
Categorization and abstraction abilities in 3-year-old children: a comparison with monkey data.3岁儿童的分类和抽象能力:与猴子数据的比较。
Anim Cogn. 2005 Jan;8(1):53-9. doi: 10.1007/s10071-004-0226-y. Epub 2004 Aug 5.
6
Processing of biological motion point-light displays by baboons (Papio papio).东非狒狒(豚尾狒狒)对生物运动点光显示的处理。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Oct;33(4):381-91. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.33.4.381.
7
Effects of training condition on the contribution of specific items to relational processing in baboons (Papio papio).训练条件对狒狒(豚尾狒狒)特定项目在关系加工中贡献的影响。
Anim Cogn. 2014 Jul;17(4):911-24. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0724-x. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
8
Relational matching in baboons (Papio papio) with reduced grouping requirements.对分组要求降低的狒狒(豚尾狒狒)进行关系匹配。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Apr;36(2):184-93. doi: 10.1037/a0017169.
9
Mechanisms of same/different concept learning in primates and avians.灵长类动物和鸟类中相同/不同概念学习的机制。
Behav Processes. 2006 Jun 1;72(3):234-54. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.03.009. Epub 2006 Mar 12.
10
Contribution of working memory processes to relational matching-to-sample performance in baboons (Papio papio).工作记忆过程对狒狒(豚尾狒狒)关系匹配样本任务表现的作用。
J Comp Psychol. 2013 Nov;127(4):370-9. doi: 10.1037/a0032336. Epub 2013 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Spot the odd one out: do snake pictures capture macaques' attention more than other predators?找出与众不同的一个:蛇的图片比其他捕食者更能吸引猕猴的注意力吗?
Anim Cogn. 2023 Nov;26(6):1945-1958. doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01831-9. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
2
Evolutionary Constraints on Human Object Perception.人类物体感知的进化限制
Cogn Sci. 2017 Nov;41(8):2126-2148. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12470. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
3
The oddity preference effect and the concept of difference in pigeons.鸽子的奇特偏好效应与差异概念

本文引用的文献

1
Categories as paradigms for comparative cognition.作为比较认知范式的类别。
Behav Processes. 1998 Feb;42(2-3):87-99. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(97)00064-8.
2
A profound disparity revisited: Perception and judgment of abstract identity relations by chimpanzees, human infants, and monkeys.重新审视一个深刻的差异:黑猩猩、人类婴儿和猴子对抽象身份关系的感知与判断。
Behav Processes. 1995 Dec;35(1-3):149-61. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(95)00048-8.
3
Picture recognition in animals and humans.动物和人类的图像识别。
Learn Behav. 2016 Dec;44(4):320-328. doi: 10.3758/s13420-016-0219-0.
4
Does presentation format influence visual size discrimination in tufted capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.)?呈现形式会影响簇绒卷尾猴(Sapajus spp.)的视觉大小辨别吗?
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 30;10(4):e0126001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126001. eCollection 2015.
5
Evidence for a Numerosity Category that is Based on Abstract Qualities of "Few" vs. "Many" in the Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus).海豚(Tursiops truncatus)的数量类别基于“少”和“多”的抽象属性的证据。
Front Psychol. 2012 Nov 7;3:473. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00473. eCollection 2012.
6
Targets for a comparative neurobiology of language.语言比较神经生物学的研究目标。
Front Evol Neurosci. 2012 Apr 9;4:6. doi: 10.3389/fnevo.2012.00006. eCollection 2012.
7
Humans and monkeys share visual representations.人类和猴子拥有相同的视觉表象。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 3;108(18):7635-40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016213108. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
8
Issues in the Comparative Cognition of Abstract-Concept Learning.抽象概念学习的比较认知中的问题。
Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2007 Jan 1;2:79-92. doi: 10.3819/ccbr.2008.20005.
9
Structure learning in action.行动中的结构学习。
Behav Brain Res. 2010 Jan 20;206(2):157-65. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.08.031. Epub 2009 Aug 29.
10
Individual differences: either relational learning or item-specific learning in a same/different task.个体差异:在相同/不同任务中,要么是关系学习,要么是特定项目学习。
Learn Behav. 2009 May;37(2):204-13. doi: 10.3758/LB.37.2.204.
Behav Brain Res. 2000 May;109(2):143-65. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(00)00146-7.
4
Functional equivalence in a California sea lion: relevance to animal social and communicative interactions.
Anim Behav. 1998 May;55(5):1087-95. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0654.
5
Language-naive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) judge relations between relations in a conceptual matching-to-sample task.未接触过语言的黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)在概念性匹配样本任务中判断关系之间的关系。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1997 Jan;23(1):31-43. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.23.1.31.
6
Reference: the linguistic essential.参考文献:语言要素。
Science. 1980 Nov 21;210(4472):922-5. doi: 10.1126/science.7434008.
7
Levels of stimulus control: a functional approach.刺激控制水平:一种功能方法。
Cognition. 1990 Nov;37(1-2):133-66. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90021-b.
8
Behavioral assessment of young nonhuman primates: perceptual-cognitive development.幼年非人灵长类动物的行为评估:感知认知发展
Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1990 Sep-Oct;12(5):543-6. doi: 10.1016/0892-0362(90)90020-d.