Foster C, Florhaug J A, Franklin J, Gottschall L, Hrovatin L A, Parker S, Doleshal P, Dodge C
Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, 54601, USA.
J Strength Cond Res. 2001 Feb;15(1):109-15.
The ability to monitor training is critical to the process of quantitating training periodization plans. To date, no method has proven successful in monitoring training during multiple types of exercise. High-intensity exercise training is particularly difficult to quantitate. In this study we evaluate the ability of the session rating of perceived exertion (RPE) method to quantitate training during non-steady state and prolonged exercise compared with an objective standard based on heart rate (HR). In a 2-part design, subjects performed steady state and interval cycle exercise or practiced basketball. Exercise bouts were quantitated using both the session RPE method and an objective HR method. During cycle exercise, the relationship between the exercise score derived using the session RPE method and the HR method was highly consistent, although the absolute score was significantly greater with the session RPE method. During basketball, there was a consistent relationship between the 2 methods of monitoring exercise, although the absolute score was also significantly greater with the session RPE method. Despite using different subjects in the 2 parts of the study, the regression relationships between the session RPE method and the HR method were nearly overlapping, suggesting the broad applicability of this method. We conclude that the session RPE method is a valid method of quantitating exercise training during a wide variety of types of exercise. As such, this technique may hold promise as a mode and intensity-independent method of quantitating exercise training and may provide a tool to allow the quantitative evaluation of training periodization plans.
监测训练的能力对于量化训练周期计划的过程至关重要。迄今为止，尚无方法被证明在监测多种类型运动的训练时是成功的。高强度运动训练尤其难以量化。在本研究中，我们评估了主观用力程度分级（RPE）方法在非稳态和长时间运动期间与基于心率（HR）的客观标准相比量化训练的能力。在一个两部分的设计中，受试者进行稳态和间歇循环运动或练习篮球。运动回合使用RPE方法和客观心率方法进行量化。在循环运动期间，使用RPE方法得出的运动得分与心率方法之间的关系高度一致，尽管RPE方法的绝对得分显著更高。在篮球运动中，两种监测运动的方法之间存在一致的关系，尽管RPE方法的绝对得分同样显著更高。尽管在研究的两部分中使用了不同的受试者，但RPE方法与心率方法之间的回归关系几乎重叠，表明该方法具有广泛的适用性。我们得出结论，RPE方法是在多种类型运动期间量化运动训练的有效方法。因此，该技术有望成为一种与运动方式和强度无关的量化运动训练方法，并可能提供一种工具，用于对训练周期计划进行定量评估。
