Raamat R, Jagomägi K, Talts J, Länsimies E, Jurvelin J, Kolari P
Department of Physiology, University of Tartu, Estonia.
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2001 Sep;39(5):584-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02345150.
Two different methods were studied for non-invasive beat-to-beat finger mean arterial pressure (MAP) measurement in 14 healthy volunteers during local arm cooling to 17 degrees C. Fingertip skin blood flow was recorded by a laser Doppler instrument. The difference between the oscillometric beat-to-beat blood pressure measurement device (UT9201) and volume clamp monitor (Finapres) before cooling was -1.5+/-1.1 mmHg, and, although statistically significant, (p< 0.01), this difference cannot be considered clinically meaningful. The results obtained using the two devices during arm cooling showed a systematic disagreement in the continuously recorded MAP. After a 30s period of cooling, the group-averaged difference of UT9201 minus Finapres, calculated as change from the baseline, reached (mean +/- SD) 8.8+/-6.3 mmHg (statistically significant, p< 0.01).
在14名健康志愿者的手臂局部冷却至17摄氏度的过程中,研究了两种不同的无创逐搏测量手指平均动脉压(MAP)的方法。用激光多普勒仪记录指尖皮肤血流。在冷却前,示波法逐搏血压测量装置(UT9201)与容积钳监测仪(Finapres)之间的差异为-1.5±1.1 mmHg,虽然具有统计学意义(p<0.01),但这种差异在临床上并无意义。在手臂冷却过程中使用这两种装置获得的结果显示,在连续记录的MAP上存在系统性差异。冷却30秒后,以相对于基线的变化计算,UT9201减去Finapres的组平均差异达到(均值±标准差)8.8±6.3 mmHg(具有统计学意义,p<0.01)。