Harewood G C, Murray J A
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Dig Dis Sci. 2001 Nov;46(11):2510-4. doi: 10.1023/a:1012396408370.
Serological testing is an important tool in the diagnostic work-up of suspected celiac disease. Our aim was to apply a decision analysis model to compare the costs of serological testing versus small bowel biopsy in the diagnostic work-up of celiac disease. A cost-minimization approach was employed. A decision analysis model with three diagnostic arms was designed using Data Version 3.5: anti-gliadin antibody versus endomysial antibody versus small bowel biopsy. Response to gluten-free diet was considered diagnostic of celiac disease; lack of response prompted a small bowel biopsy to definitively exclude celiac disease. Baseline probabilities were varied using sensitivity analysis. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the endomysial antibody strategy was least costly, provided the prevalence of celiac disease was less than 42%; above this anti-gliadin antibody became the most economical option. In conclusion, initial screening with endomysial antibody is the least costly strategy for diagnosing celiac disease in a low risk population. Antigliadin antibody becomes the cheaper strategy for higher risk populations.
血清学检测是疑似乳糜泻诊断检查中的一项重要工具。我们的目的是应用决策分析模型,比较血清学检测与小肠活检在乳糜泻诊断检查中的成本。采用了成本最小化方法。使用Data Version 3.5设计了一个具有三个诊断分支的决策分析模型:抗麦醇溶蛋白抗体与抗肌内膜抗体与小肠活检。对无麸质饮食的反应被视为乳糜泻的诊断依据;无反应则促使进行小肠活检以明确排除乳糜泻。通过敏感性分析改变基线概率。敏感性分析表明,只要乳糜泻患病率低于42%,抗肌内膜抗体策略成本最低;高于此患病率,抗麦醇溶蛋白抗体则成为最经济的选择。总之,在低风险人群中,用抗肌内膜抗体进行初始筛查是诊断乳糜泻成本最低的策略。对于高风险人群,抗麦醇溶蛋白抗体则成为成本更低的策略。