Coster S, Poole K, Fallowfield L J
Department of Oncology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001 Aug;68(3):273-82. doi: 10.1023/a:1012278023233.
This paper documents the validation of a quality of life scale (QOL) designed to assess the impact of arm morbidity on patients following breast cancer surgery. A four item arm subscale was developed to supplement a multi-dimensional, validated breast cancer QOL tool, the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT-B.) The new questionnaire, the FACT-B + 4, was validated on 279 women participating in a trial of sentinel node guided axillary therapy and 29 women attending a lymphoedema clinic. The subscale demonstrated good internal consistency (alpha co-efficient = 0.62 to 0.88) and stability (test-retest reliability = 0.97). Lymphoedema patients reported significantly greater arm problems than a matched sample of pre-operative trial participants. The lymphoedema group also scored lower than trial patients on the FACT-B + 4 indicating a poorer quality of life (p < 0.05). A subset of 66 trial patients who had completed three consecutive assessments was used to evaluate the sensitivity of the questionnaire to change over time. Scores on the FACT-B + 4 were found to decline significantly between the pre-operative assessment and post-operative assessment at 1 month. Arm problems significantly increased during this period. FACT-B + 4 score increased again from 1 month to 12 weeks post-surgery and symptoms reduced, as the extent of arm morbidity resolved. The FACT-B + 4 appears to be psychometrically robust and sensitive to patient rehabilitation, making it suitable for use in longitudinal surgical trials. Given the dearth of existing scales available to measure arm morbidity, we hope this new tool will prove useful to researchers.
本文记录了一种生活质量量表(QOL)的验证情况,该量表旨在评估乳腺癌手术后手臂疾病对患者的影响。开发了一个包含四个条目的手臂子量表,以补充多维且经过验证的乳腺癌生活质量工具——癌症治疗功能评估量表(FACT - B)。新问卷FACT - B + 4在279名参与前哨淋巴结引导腋窝治疗试验的女性以及29名前往淋巴水肿诊所就诊的女性中进行了验证。该子量表显示出良好的内部一致性(α系数 = 0.62至0.88)和稳定性(重测信度 = 0.97)。与术前试验参与者的匹配样本相比,淋巴水肿患者报告的手臂问题明显更多。淋巴水肿组在FACT - B + 4上的得分也低于试验患者,表明生活质量较差(p < 0.05)。使用66名完成了连续三次评估的试验患者子集来评估问卷对随时间变化的敏感性。发现在术前评估和术后1个月评估之间,FACT - B + 4的得分显著下降。在此期间,手臂问题显著增加。从术后1个月到术后12周,FACT - B + 4得分再次上升,且随着手臂疾病程度的缓解,症状减轻。FACT - B + 4在心理测量学上似乎很稳健,并且对患者康复敏感,使其适用于纵向手术试验。鉴于现有的用于测量手臂疾病的量表匮乏,我们希望这个新工具对研究人员有用。