• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作记忆与推理:来自阅读过程中眼动注视的证据。

Working memory and inferences: Evidence from eye fixations during reading.

作者信息

Calvo Manuel G.

机构信息

University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.

出版信息

Memory. 2001 Jul;9(4):365-381. doi: 10.1080/09658210143000083.

DOI:10.1080/09658210143000083
PMID:11747589
Abstract

Eye fixations during reading were monitored to examine the relationship between individual differences in working memory capacity-as assessed by the reading span task-and inferences about predictable events. Context sentences predicting likely events, or non-predicting control sentences, were presented. They were followed by continuation sentences in which a target word represented an event to be inferred (inferential word) or an unlikely event (non-predictable word). A main effect of reading span showed that high working memory capacity was related to shorter gaze durations across sentence regions. More specific findings involved an interaction between context, target, and reading span on late processing measures and regions. Thus, for high- but not for low-span readers, the predicting condition, relative to the control condition, facilitated reanalysis of the continuation sentence that represented the inference concept. This effect was revealed by a reduction in regression-path reading time in the last region of the sentence, involving less time reading that region and fewer regressions from it. These results indicate that working memory facilitates elaborative inferences during reading, but that this occurs at late text-integration processes, rather than at early lexical-access processes.

摘要

在阅读过程中监测眼睛注视情况,以检验通过阅读广度任务评估的工作记忆容量个体差异与对可预测事件的推理之间的关系。呈现了预测可能事件的上下文句子或不进行预测的对照句子。随后是延续句,其中目标词代表要推断的事件(推理词)或不太可能发生的事件(不可预测词)。阅读广度的主效应表明,高工作记忆容量与跨句子区域的较短注视持续时间相关。更具体的发现涉及上下文、目标和阅读广度在后期加工测量和区域上的相互作用。因此,对于高阅读广度但非低阅读广度的读者,与对照条件相比,预测条件促进了对代表推理概念的延续句的重新分析。这种效应通过句子最后区域的回归路径阅读时间减少得以体现,即阅读该区域的时间减少且从该区域的回归次数减少。这些结果表明,工作记忆在阅读过程中促进精细推理,但这发生在后期的文本整合过程中,而非早期的词汇通达过程中。

相似文献

1
Working memory and inferences: Evidence from eye fixations during reading.工作记忆与推理:来自阅读过程中眼动注视的证据。
Memory. 2001 Jul;9(4):365-381. doi: 10.1080/09658210143000083.
2
Working memory and inferences: evidence from eye fixations during reading.工作记忆与推理:阅读过程中眼动注视的证据
Memory. 2001 Jul-Nov;9(4-6):365-81. doi: 10.1080/09658210143000083.
3
Working memory capacity and time course of predictive inferences.工作记忆容量与预测性推理的时间进程。
Memory. 2000 Jan;8(1):51-61. doi: 10.1080/096582100387704.
4
Inferences about predictable events: eye movements during reading.关于可预测事件的推断:阅读过程中的眼动
Psychol Res. 2001;65(3):158-69. doi: 10.1007/s004260000050.
5
Individual Differences in Inference Generation: An ERP Analysis.个体推断生成的差异:一项 ERP 分析。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Nov;9(6):776-87. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.6.776.
6
Neural correlates of syntactic ambiguity in sentence comprehension for low and high span readers.低阅读跨度和高阅读跨度读者在句子理解中句法歧义的神经关联。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Nov;16(9):1562-75. doi: 10.1162/0898929042568479.
7
Eye-fixation patterns of high- and low-span young and older adults: down the garden path and back again.高跨度和低跨度的年轻人及老年人的眼动注视模式:误入歧途又重回正轨。
Psychol Aging. 2004 Mar;19(1):157-70. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.19.1.157.
8
On the cost of syntactic ambiguity in human language comprehension: an individual differences approach.论人类语言理解中句法歧义的代价:个体差异研究方法
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Sep;21(1):11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.05.007.
9
The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading.合理性对阅读中眼动的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Nov;30(6):1290-301. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1290.
10
Event-related potential indicators of text integration across sentence boundaries.跨句子边界的文本整合的事件相关电位指标。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Jan;33(1):55-89. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.55.

引用本文的文献

1
How Do Stress Situations Affect Higher-Level Text Processing in L1 and L2 Readers? An Eye-Tracking Study.压力情境如何影响母语和第二语言读者的高级文本处理?一项眼动追踪研究。
J Eye Mov Res. 2025 Mar 24;18(2):7. doi: 10.3390/jemr18020007. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Can discourse processing performance serve as an early marker of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment? A systematic review of text comprehension.话语处理能力能否作为阿尔茨海默病和轻度认知障碍的早期标志物?一项关于文本理解的系统综述。
Eur J Ageing. 2021 Apr 20;19(1):3-18. doi: 10.1007/s10433-021-00619-5. eCollection 2022 Mar.
3
The effect of interactive analytical dashboard features on situation awareness and task performance.
交互式分析仪表板功能对态势感知和任务绩效的影响。
Decis Support Syst. 2020 Aug;135:113322. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2020.113322. Epub 2020 May 19.
4
Inference comprehension from reading in individuals with mild cognitive impairment.从轻度认知障碍患者的阅读中进行推理理解。
Acta Neurol Belg. 2021 Aug;121(4):879-887. doi: 10.1007/s13760-019-01264-7. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
5
Parafoveal Processing in Chinese Sentence Reading: Early Extraction of Radical Level Phonology.中文句子阅读中的中央凹旁加工:部首层级音韵的早期提取
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 29;9:1605. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01605. eCollection 2018.
6
Beyond eye gaze: What else can eyetracking reveal about cognition and cognitive development?超越目光注视:眼动追踪还能揭示关于认知和认知发展的哪些方面?
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Jun;25:69-91. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
7
Differentiable cortical networks for inferences concerning people's intentions versus physical causality.可微皮质网络,用于推断人们的意图与物理因果关系。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Feb;32(2):313-29. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21021.
8
Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking during reading.语言理解过程中基于相似性的干扰:来自阅读过程中眼动追踪的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Nov;32(6):1304-21. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1304.
9
Linguistic complexity and information structure in Korean: evidence from eye-tracking during reading.韩语中的语言复杂性与信息结构:阅读过程中眼动追踪的证据
Cognition. 2007 Sep;104(3):495-534. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.013. Epub 2006 Sep 12.