• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

压力情境如何影响母语和第二语言读者的高级文本处理?一项眼动追踪研究。

How Do Stress Situations Affect Higher-Level Text Processing in L1 and L2 Readers? An Eye-Tracking Study.

作者信息

Xia Ziqing, Chen Chun-Hsien, Kuo Jo-Yu, Zhang Mingmin

机构信息

School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore;

Department of Industrial Design, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608 City, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Eye Mov Res. 2025 Mar 24;18(2):7. doi: 10.3390/jemr18020007. eCollection 2025 Apr.

DOI:10.3390/jemr18020007
PMID:40290628
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12028106/
Abstract

Existing studies have revealed that the reading comprehension ability of readers can be adversely affected by their psychosocial stress. Yet, the detailed impact of stress on various stages of text processing is understudied. This study aims to explore how the higher-level text processing ability, including syntactic parsing, sentence integration, and global text processing, of first language (L1) and second language (L2) English readers is affected under stress situations. In addition, the roles of trait anxiety, the central executive function moderating stress effects, in text processing were also examined. Twenty-two L1 readers and twenty-one L2 readers were asked to perform reading comprehension tasks under different stress situations. Eye-tracking technology was adopted to record participants' visual behaviors while reading, and ten eye-movement measurements were computed to represent the effect of different types of text processing. The results demonstrate that the stress reduced the efficiency of syntactic parsing and sentence integration in both L1 and L2 groups, but only impaired global text processing in L2 readers. Specifically, L2 readers focused more on the topic structure of text to facilitate comprehension under stress situations. Moreover, only L1 readers' higher-level text processing was affected by trait anxiety, while L2 readers' processing was mainly related to their reading proficiency level. Future studies and applications were discussed. The findings advance our understanding of stress effects on different stages of higher-level text processing. They also have practical implications for developing interventions to help language learners suffering from stress disorders.

摘要

现有研究表明,读者的阅读理解能力会受到其心理社会压力的不利影响。然而,压力对文本处理各个阶段的具体影响尚未得到充分研究。本研究旨在探讨在压力情境下,第一语言(L1)和第二语言(L2)为英语的读者的高级文本处理能力,包括句法解析、句子整合和整体文本处理,是如何受到影响的。此外,还考察了特质焦虑,即调节压力效应的中央执行功能,在文本处理中的作用。22名L1读者和21名L2读者被要求在不同的压力情境下完成阅读理解任务。采用眼动追踪技术记录参与者阅读时的视觉行为,并计算10项眼动指标来反映不同类型文本处理的效果。结果表明,压力降低了L1组和L2组的句法解析和句子整合效率,但仅损害了L2读者的整体文本处理能力。具体而言,L2读者在压力情境下更关注文本的主题结构以促进理解。此外,只有L1读者的高级文本处理受到特质焦虑的影响,而L2读者的处理主要与其阅读熟练程度有关。文中讨论了未来的研究和应用。这些发现增进了我们对压力对高级文本处理不同阶段影响的理解。它们对于开发干预措施以帮助患有压力障碍的语言学习者也具有实际意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1faf/12028106/4e20b75d933c/jemr-18-00007-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1faf/12028106/9df5a0c1e535/jemr-18-00007-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1faf/12028106/582b9748d153/jemr-18-00007-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1faf/12028106/4e20b75d933c/jemr-18-00007-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1faf/12028106/9df5a0c1e535/jemr-18-00007-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1faf/12028106/582b9748d153/jemr-18-00007-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1faf/12028106/4e20b75d933c/jemr-18-00007-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
How Do Stress Situations Affect Higher-Level Text Processing in L1 and L2 Readers? An Eye-Tracking Study.压力情境如何影响母语和第二语言读者的高级文本处理?一项眼动追踪研究。
J Eye Mov Res. 2025 Mar 24;18(2):7. doi: 10.3390/jemr18020007. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Lexico-syntactic interactions during the processing of temporally ambiguous L2 relative clauses: An eye-tracking study with intermediate and advanced Portuguese-English bilinguals.二语时间歧义关系从句加工中的词汇句法互动:一项针对中级和高级葡英双语者的眼动研究。
PLoS One. 2019 May 29;14(5):e0216779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216779. eCollection 2019.
3
Non-selective language activation in L2 lexical inference and text comprehension: Comparing skilled and less-skilled readers.二语词汇推理与文本理解中的非选择性语言激活:熟练读者与非熟练读者的比较
Heliyon. 2023 Jan 5;9(1):e12818. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12818. eCollection 2023 Jan.
4
Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers' Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced Reading.二语英语学习者句法加工中的任务敏感性:来自自定步速阅读中足够好加工的证据
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 11;11:575847. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575847. eCollection 2020.
5
Frequency and predictability effects in first and second language of different script bilinguals.不同文字系统双语者在第一语言和第二语言中的频率和可预测性效应
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Sep;48(9):1363-1383. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000927. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
6
Understanding the centrality deficit: insight from foreign language learners.理解中心缺失:外语学习者的启示。
Mem Cognit. 2011 Jul;39(5):873-83. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0062-z.
7
Individual Chunking Ability Predicts Efficient or Shallow L2 Processing: Eye-Tracking Evidence From Multiword Units in Relative Clauses.个体组块能力预测二语加工的高效性或浅度性:来自关系从句中多词单位的眼动追踪证据
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 15;11:607621. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.607621. eCollection 2020.
8
Cerebral mechanisms for different second language writing systems.不同第二语言书写系统的大脑机制。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Sep;51(11):2261-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Aug 11.
9
Functional Neuroanatomy of Second Language Sentence Comprehension: An fMRI Study of Late Learners of American Sign Language.第二语言句子理解的功能神经解剖学:一项针对美国手语晚期学习者的功能磁共振成像研究。
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 6;9:1626. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01626. eCollection 2018.
10
Mandarin Chinese L1 and L2 complex sentence reading reveals a consistent electrophysiological pattern of highly interactive syntactic and semantic processing: An ERP study.普通话第一语言和第二语言复杂句子阅读揭示了句法和语义高度交互处理的一致电生理模式:一项ERP研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 19;14:1143062. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1143062. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Challenge-obstacle stressors and cyberloafing among higher vocational education students: the moderating role of smartphone addiction and Maladaptive.高职学生的挑战 - 障碍性压力源与网络偷懒行为:智能手机成瘾和适应不良的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 18;15:1358634. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1358634. eCollection 2024.
2
Academic Stress Interventions in High Schools: A Systematic Literature Review.高中阶段的学业压力干预措施:一项系统的文献综述。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Mar 4. doi: 10.1007/s10578-024-01667-5.
3
An Application of Eye Movement Parameters Collected from Mass Market Devices for the Estimation of a Text Comprehension.
从大众市场设备收集的眼动参数在文本理解评估中的应用。
J Eye Mov Res. 2023 Mar 20;16(2). doi: 10.16910/jemr.16.2.1. eCollection 2023.
4
Effects of word length and word frequency among dyslexic, ADHD-I and typical readers.阅读障碍者、注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD-I)患者及正常读者中单词长度和单词频率的影响。
J Eye Mov Res. 2022 Jun 14;15(1). doi: 10.16910/jemr.15.1.1. eCollection 2022.
5
Understanding the relationships between physiological and psychosocial stress, cortisol and cognition.理解生理和心理压力、皮质醇与认知之间的关系。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 6;14:1085950. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1085950. eCollection 2023.
6
You read best what you read most: An eye tracking study.你读得最多的内容读得最好:一项眼动追踪研究。
J Eye Mov Res. 2020 Nov 5;13(2). doi: 10.16910/jemr.13.2.9.
7
Reading Shakespeare Sonnets: Combining Quantitative Narrative Analysis and Predictive Modeling -an Eye Tracking Study.阅读莎士比亚十四行诗:结合定量叙事分析与预测建模——一项眼动追踪研究
J Eye Mov Res. 2019 Mar 27;12(5). doi: 10.16910/jemr.12.5.2.
8
Visualizing the Reading Activity of People Learning to Read.观察人们学习阅读时的阅读活动。
J Eye Mov Res. 2017 Nov 15;10(5). doi: 10.16910/jemr.10.5.5.
9
Eye tracking in Educational Science: Theoretical frameworks and research agendas.教育科学中的眼动追踪:理论框架与研究议程。
J Eye Mov Res. 2017 Feb 4;10(1). doi: 10.16910/jemr.10.1.3.
10
Stress and information processing: acute psychosocial stress affects levels of mental abstraction.压力与信息加工:急性社会心理压力会影响心理抽象水平。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2021 Jan;34(1):83-95. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2020.1839646. Epub 2020 Oct 30.