• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Effects of acute and chronic interactions of diazepam and d-amphetamine on punished behavior of rats.

作者信息

Ford R D, Rech R H, Commissaris R L, Meyer L Y

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1979 Oct;65(2):197-204. doi: 10.1007/BF00433049.

DOI:10.1007/BF00433049
PMID:117489
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Effects of acute and chronic interactions of diazepam and d-amphetamine on punished behavior of rats.地西泮与右旋苯丙胺的急性和慢性相互作用对大鼠受罚行为的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1979 Oct;65(2):197-204. doi: 10.1007/BF00433049.
2
The effects of benzodiazepines and serotonergic manipulations on punished responding.苯二氮䓬类药物和血清素能操作对受罚反应的影响。
Neuropharmacology. 1979 Aug-Sep;18(8-9):689-95. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(79)90036-4.
3
Interactions between stimulants and depressants on schedule-controlled behavior.兴奋剂与抑制剂对按时间表控制行为的相互作用。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1980 May;12(5):657-61. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(80)90144-6.
4
Drugs and punished responding. II. d-Amphetamine-induced increases in punished responding.药物与受罚反应。II. 右旋苯丙胺引起的受罚反应增加。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Sep;20(2):291-300. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-291.
5
The effects of d-amphetamine and diazepam on schedule-induced defecation in rats.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1994 Jul;48(3):787-90. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(94)90347-6.
6
Some effects of chlordiazepoxide and d-amphetamine on response force during punished responding in rats.氯氮卓和右旋苯丙胺对大鼠惩罚性反应期间反应力的一些影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1978 Mar 1;56(2):211-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00431852.
7
The effect of cocaine and D-amphetamine on punished responding.
Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1977 May;227(1):98-105.
8
Prior and ongoing experience as determinants of the effects of d-amphetamine and chlorpromazine on punished behavior.既往及持续经验作为右旋苯丙胺和氯丙嗪对受罚行为影响的决定因素。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1979 Oct;211(1):80-5.
9
Drugs and punished responding. I. Rate-dependent effects under multiple schedules.药物与受惩罚反应。I. 多重时间表下的速率依赖性效应。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jan;19(1):133-45. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-133.
10
Comparison of drug effects on responding punished by pressurized air or electric shock delivery in squirrel monkeys: pentobarbital, chlordiazepoxide, d-amphetamine and cocaine.松鼠猴中药物对空气加压或电击惩罚反应的影响比较：戊巴比妥、氯氮卓、右旋苯丙胺和可卡因。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1979 May;209(2):309-15.

引用本文的文献

1
An unescapable looming threat paradigm for assessing anxiety-like responses in rats.用于评估大鼠类焦虑反应的无法逃避的迫在眉睫威胁范式。
Behav Brain Res. 2025 Feb 4;477:115296. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2024.115296. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
2
Effects of Diazepam on Reaction Times to Stop and Go.地西泮对停止和继续反应时间的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Oct 6;14:567177. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.567177. eCollection 2020.
3
Interactions of metergoline with diazepam, quipazine, and hallucinogenic drugs on a conflict behavior in the rat.麦角乙脲与地西泮、喹哌嗪及致幻药物对大鼠冲突行为的相互作用。

本文引用的文献

1
RELATIVE POTENCIES OF BENZODIAZEPINES AS MEASURED BY THEIR EFFECTS ON CONFLICT BEHAVIOR.通过对冲突行为的影响来衡量的苯二氮䓬类药物的相对效价。
Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1964 May 1;149:243-7.
2
MUTUAL POTENTIATION OF AMPHETAMINE AND AMYLOBARBITONE MEASURED BY ACTIVITY IN RATS.通过大鼠活动测量苯丙胺和戊巴比妥的相互增强作用
Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1963 Oct;21(2):295-305. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1963.tb01528.x.
3
Dose-response relations of amphetamine-barbiturate mixtures.
Nature. 1963 Mar 9;197:1017-8. doi: 10.1038/1971017a0.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1982;76(3):282-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00432562.
4
Lack of central 5-hydroxytryptamine influence on the anticonflict activity of diazepam.中枢5-羟色胺对安定抗冲突活性缺乏影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1982;78(2):156-64. doi: 10.1007/BF00432255.
5
Comparison of anti-conflict drug effects in three experimental animal models of anxiety.三种焦虑症实验动物模型中抗冲突药物效果的比较。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1981;74(3):290-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00427112.
6
Chlordiazepoxide attenuates response suppression induced by corticotropin-releasing factor in the conflict test.在冲突试验中，氯氮卓可减弱促肾上腺皮质激素释放因子诱导的反应抑制。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1985;86(1-2):170-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00431704.
7
MR/Har and MNRA/Har Maudsley rat strains: differences in acoustic startle habituation.
Behav Genet. 1988 Nov;18(6):663-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01066848.
8
Antagonism of the anti-conflict effects of phenobarbital, but not diazepam, by the A-1 adenosine agonist l-PIA.A-1腺苷激动剂l-PIA对苯巴比妥而非地西泮的抗冲突效应具有拮抗作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1990;102(3):283-90. doi: 10.1007/BF02244091.
9
Benzodiazepine anti-conflict effects in Maudsley reactive (MR/Har) and non-reactive (MNRA/Har) rats.苯二氮䓬类药物对莫兹利反应型（MR/Har）和非反应型（MNRA/Har）大鼠的抗冲突作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1990;100(3):287-92. doi: 10.1007/BF02244595.
4
Interactions between the effects of methamphetamine and pentobarbital on operant behavior in the pigeon.甲基苯丙胺和戊巴比妥对鸽子操作性行为影响之间的相互作用。
Psychopharmacologia. 1965 May 21;7(6):400-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00402362.
5
Persistence of the effect of amphetamine on stereotyped activity in rats.苯丙胺对大鼠刻板行为的影响的持续性。
Eur J Pharmacol. 1969 May;6(2):200-1. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(69)90220-9.
6
Mode of action of apomorphine and dexamphetamine on gnawing compulsion in rats.阿扑吗啡和右旋苯丙胺对大鼠啃咬强迫行为的作用机制
Psychopharmacologia. 1967;10(4):316-23. doi: 10.1007/BF00403900.
7
Enhancement of amphetamine-induced stereotyped behavior by benzodiazepines.苯二氮䓬类药物增强苯丙胺诱导的刻板行为。
Eur J Pharmacol. 1971;13(3):330-40. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(71)90223-8.
8
The effect of chlordiazepoxide, diazepam and nitrazepam on catecholamine metabolism in regions of the rat brain.
Eur J Pharmacol. 1969 Dec;8(3):296-301. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(69)90038-7.
9
Combined action of diazepam and d-amphetamine on fixed-interval performance in cats.地西泮和右旋苯丙胺对猫固定间隔行为表现的联合作用。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):989-98. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-989.
10
Lithium attenuates drug-induced hyperactivity in rats.锂可减轻大鼠药物诱发的多动。
Nature. 1971 Jul 30;232(5309):336-8. doi: 10.1038/232336a0.