• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理抗拒:心理抗拒测量问卷的因子结构与内部一致性

Psychological reactance: factor structure and internal consistency of the Questionnaire for the Measurement of Psychological Reactance.

作者信息

Donnell A J, Thomas A, Buboltz W C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Louisiana Tech University, USA.

出版信息

J Soc Psychol. 2001 Oct;141(5):679-87. doi: 10.1080/00224540109600581.

DOI:10.1080/00224540109600581
PMID:11758045
Abstract

Psychological reactance, the theory that people resist attempts to constrain either their thoughts or their behaviors (J. W. Brehm, 1966), has been an influential concept in social psychology. In an attempt to measure reactance, J. Merz (1983) developed the Questionnaire for the Measurement of Psychological Reactance (QMPR). Subsequent researchers (S.-M. Hong & R. Ostini, 1989; R. K. Tucker & P. Y. Byers, 1987) have debated both the exact factor structure and the psychometric stability of the QMPR. In the present study, 898 undergraduates completed the QMPR. Factor analysis suggested that psychological reactance is multidimensional. The authors found 3 factors underlying the QMPR, but the QMPR provided unreliable estimates for each of those factors. According to the results, the QMPR as currently written is psychometrically unsatisfactory.

摘要

心理抗拒理论认为,人们会抵制对其思想或行为的限制企图(J. W. 布雷姆,1966年),这一理论在社会心理学中一直是一个有影响力的概念。为了测量抗拒心理,J. 默茨(1983年)编制了《心理抗拒测量问卷》(QMPR)。后续研究人员(S.-M. 洪和R. 奥斯特尼,1989年;R. K. 塔克和P. Y. 拜尔斯,1987年)对QMPR的确切因素结构和心理测量稳定性进行了辩论。在本研究中,898名本科生完成了QMPR。因素分析表明,心理抗拒是多维的。作者发现QMPR有3个潜在因素,但QMPR对这些因素中的每一个都提供了不可靠的估计。根据结果,目前编写的QMPR在心理测量方面并不令人满意。

相似文献

1
Psychological reactance: factor structure and internal consistency of the Questionnaire for the Measurement of Psychological Reactance.心理抗拒:心理抗拒测量问卷的因子结构与内部一致性
J Soc Psychol. 2001 Oct;141(5):679-87. doi: 10.1080/00224540109600581.
2
Contingencies of self-worth in college students: theory and measurement.大学生自我价值的权变因素:理论与测量
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Nov;85(5):894-908. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.894.
3
[Study of psychometric properties of two new questionnaires assessing beliefs in hypochondriasis in a non-clinical population].[两项评估非临床人群疑病症信念的新问卷的心理测量特性研究]
Encephale. 2002 Jul-Aug;28(4):298-309.
4
Responses to stress in adolescence: measurement of coping and involuntary stress responses.青少年对压力的反应:应对方式和非自主应激反应的测量
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000 Dec;68(6):976-92.
5
Psychometric properties of the Hong psychological reactance scale.香港心理抗拒量表的心理测量特性。
J Pers Assess. 2005 Aug;85(1):74-81. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8501_07.
6
[Factorial analysis and internal consistency of the French version of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS 20), in obese women].[肥胖女性中多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS 20)法语版的因子分析与内部一致性]
Encephale. 2002 Jul-Aug;28(4):277-82.
7
[Preliminary validation of the French translation of anxiety sensibility index-revised (ASI-R)].[焦虑敏感性指数修订版(ASI-R)法语翻译的初步验证]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):157-64.
8
Predicting psychological symptoms: the role of perceived thought control ability.预测心理症状:感知到的思维控制能力的作用。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2009;38(1):16-28. doi: 10.1080/16506070802561215.
9
Group administration of the children's attributional style interview.儿童归因风格访谈的分组管理。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2007 Jul-Sep;36(3):476-82. doi: 10.1080/15374410701448711.
10
The Inventory of Personality Organization: psychometric properties, factorial composition, and criterion relations with affect, aggressive dyscontrol, psychosis proneness, and self-domains in a nonclinical sample.人格组织量表:非临床样本中的心理测量特性、因子构成以及与情感、攻击行为失控、精神病倾向和自我领域的标准关系
Psychol Assess. 2001 Dec;13(4):577-91.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Self-Report vs. Performance Measures of Attentional Control and Efficiency.比较注意力控制与效率的自我报告与表现测量方法
NeuroSci. 2024 Apr 4;5(2):114-127. doi: 10.3390/neurosci5020008. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Novel Predictors of COVID-19 Protective Behaviors Among US Adults: Cross-sectional Survey.新冠病毒保护行为的新型预测因子:美国成年人的横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 20;23(4):e23488. doi: 10.2196/23488.
3
Analysis and Psychoeducational Implications of the Behavior Factor During the COVID-19 Emergency.
新冠疫情期间行为因素的分析及心理教育意义
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 16;12:613881. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.613881. eCollection 2021.
4
Salzburger State Reactance Scale (SSR Scale): Validation of a Scale Measuring State Reactance.萨尔茨堡状态反抗量表(SSR量表):一种测量状态反抗的量表的验证
Z Psychol. 2015;223(4):257-266. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000227.
5
Influences of Self-Efficacy, Response Efficacy, and Reactance on Responses to Cigarette Health Warnings: A Longitudinal Study of Adult Smokers in Australia and Canada.自我效能感、反应效能感和逆反心理对香烟健康警示反应的影响:一项针对澳大利亚和加拿大成年吸烟者的纵向研究
Health Commun. 2016 Dec;31(12):1517-26. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2015.1089456. Epub 2016 May 2.
6
Observing the restriction of another person: vicarious reactance and the role of self-construal and culture.观察他人受到的限制:替代性反抗以及自我建构和文化的作用。
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 4;6:1052. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01052. eCollection 2015.