Pieh Stefan, Marvan Patrick, Lackner Birgit, Hanselmayer Georg, Schmidinger Gerald, Leitgeb Rainer, Sticker Markus, Hitzenberger Christoph K, Fercher Adolf F, Skorpik Christian
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna Medical School, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Jan;120(1):23-8. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.1.23.
To compare the optical properties of bifocal diffractive and multifocal refractive intraocular lenses.
A model eye with a pupil 4.5 mm in diameter was used to determine the point spread function (PSF) of the distance focus and near focus of a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens (IOL) (model 811E; Pharmacia Inc, Columbus, Ohio) and of a refractive multifocal IOL (model SA40N; Allergan Optical Inc, Irvine, Calif) to compare them with PSFs of foci of corresponding monofocal lenses. For interpreting the PSFs the through focus response, the modulation transfer function, and the Strehl ratio were evaluated.
The intensity of the distance focus of the bifocal diffractive lens reached 58.5% and the near focus attained 42.7% of the intensity of a corresponding monofocal lens. The maximal halo intensity surrounding both foci was approximately 4.5%. The distance peak of the refractive multifocal IOL was 73.4% and the near peak 25.1% of a corresponding monofocal lens. The out-of-focus image overlaying the distance focus of the refractive multifocal IOL was approximately 3% of the light intensity of the distance focus, whereas the PSF of the near focus of the multifocal IOL is substantially affected by out-of-focus images. The computed modulation transfer functions show better results for the monofocal lenses, similar results for the tested distance foci, and clear advantages for the bifocal diffractive near focus.
Modulation transfer functions reveal comparable properties for distance vision and a superiority of the bifocal diffractive lens over the refractive multifocal lens for near vision.
比较双焦点衍射型和多焦点折射型人工晶状体的光学特性。
使用直径为4.5 mm瞳孔的模型眼,测定衍射双焦点人工晶状体(IOL)(811E型;Pharmacia公司,俄亥俄州哥伦布市)和折射多焦点IOL(SA40N型;Allergan光学公司,加利福尼亚州欧文市)远焦点和近焦点的点扩散函数(PSF),并与相应单焦点晶状体焦点的PSF进行比较。为解释PSF,评估了全焦点响应、调制传递函数和斯特列尔比。
双焦点衍射晶状体远焦点强度达到相应单焦点晶状体强度的58.5%,近焦点达到42.7%。两个焦点周围的最大光晕强度约为4.5%。折射多焦点IOL的远焦点峰值为相应单焦点晶状体的73.4%,近焦点峰值为25.1%。叠加在折射多焦点IOL远焦点上的离焦图像约为远焦点光强的3%,而多焦点IOL近焦点的PSF受离焦图像影响较大。计算得到的调制传递函数显示,单焦点晶状体的结果更好,测试远焦点的结果相似,双焦点衍射近焦点具有明显优势。
调制传递函数显示,远视力方面特性相当,双焦点衍射晶状体在近视力方面优于折射多焦点晶状体。