Garcia-Jacas Núria, Garnatje Teresa, Susanna Alfonso, Vilatersana Roser
Botanical Institute of Barcelona (C.S.I.C.-Ajuntament de Barcelona), Av. Muntanyans, s.n., E-08038 Barcelona, Spain.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2002 Jan;22(1):51-64. doi: 10.1006/mpev.2001.1038.
Tribal delimitation of Cardueae is controversial, and the traditional classification in four subtribes (Echinopsidinae, Carlininae, Carduinae, and Centaureinae) has fluctuated widely. Most of the problems are centered in subtribes Echinopsidinae and Carlininae, often segregated with tribal rank. We therefore analyzed DNA sequences of the internal transcribed spaces (ITS) of the nuclear ribosomal DNA genes and the matK gene of the chloroplast DNA of a broad representation of the tribe to examine (1) the phylogeny of the tribe, (2) the position of Echinopsidinae and Carlininae, (3) the circumscription of the subtribes and the position of some conflicting genera, and (4) the delimitation of some generic complexes in the Carduinae. Phylogenetic analysis of ITS and matK sequence variation, both separate and combined, strongly support the monophyly of Cardueae including Carlininae and Echinopsidinae. The combination of both genomes suggest that Xeranthemum and its allies should be included among the Echinopsidinae rather than the Carlininae, which implies that the capitulum of Xeranthemum could be interpreted as a syncephaly. The subtribe Centaureinae forms a well-supported clade, and their sister clades contain the genera Arctium, Cousinia, Jurinea, and Saussurea from the Carduinae. However, some problems persist: Carduinae are a paraphyletic assemblage, and the subtribal placement of Berardia, Cardopatium, Cousiniopsis, and Staehelina remains unresolved. Our results also indicate that present classification in four subtribes is unsatisfactory, but it is still the only practical approach.
刺头菊族(Cardueae)的族下划分存在争议,传统上分为四个亚族(蓝刺头亚族Echinopsidinae、刺苞亚族Carlininae、飞廉亚族Carduinae和矢车菊亚族Centaureinae),其分类一直波动很大。大多数问题集中在蓝刺头亚族和刺苞亚族,它们常被划分到族级。因此,我们分析了该族广泛代表性类群的核糖体DNA基因的内转录间隔区(ITS)和叶绿体DNA的matK基因的DNA序列,以研究:(1)该族的系统发育;(2)蓝刺头亚族和刺苞亚族的位置;(3)亚族的界定以及一些存在争议属的位置;(4)飞廉亚族中一些类复合群的划分。对ITS和matK序列变异进行单独和联合的系统发育分析,有力地支持了包括刺苞亚族和蓝刺头亚族在内的刺头菊族的单系性。两个基因组的联合分析表明,干花菊属(Xeranthemum)及其近缘属应归入蓝刺头亚族而非刺苞亚族,这意味着干花菊属的头状花序可被解释为聚伞圆锥花序。矢车菊亚族形成了一个得到充分支持的分支,其姐妹分支包含飞廉亚族的牛蒡属(Arctium)、刺头菊属(Cousinia)、苓菊属(Jurinea)和风毛菊属(Saussurea)。然而,一些问题仍然存在:飞廉亚族是一个并系类群组合,而小针苞菊属(Berardia)[或无芒刺头菊属(Cardopatium)]、假刺头菊属(Cousiniopsis)和肉菊属(Staehelina)的亚族归属仍未解决。我们的结果还表明,目前分为四个亚族的分类并不令人满意,但它仍然是唯一可行的方法。