Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Jul;194:105823. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105823. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
To date no studies have evaluated long term cognitive decline after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We evaluated whether participants who had CEA were at increased risk of cognitive decline over participants who didn't undergo CEA.
The patients in the study were participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), a study of 5201 men and women over the age of 65 who were recruited from four communities (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Sacramento, California; Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Hagerstown, Maryland) in 1988-89. The outcomes measured were 1) Decline in 3MSE and digit symbol substitution test (DSST) scores after CEA compared to before CEA. 2) All-cause mortality in CHS cohort among participants who did and did not have CEA.
CEA patients had significantly greater annual decrease in the DSST scores -2.43 (SD 4.21) compared to those who did not have a CEA -1.1 (SD 2.57) (p < 0.001) but this was not seen in the 3MSE scores. CEA patients had increased the risk of decline in DSST (OR 2.41, 95 % CI 1.49, 3.88) and 3MSE (OR 2.17, 95 % CI 1.35, 3.48) scores after adjusting for age, gender, race and educational status. CEA was associated with all-cause mortality in the long term with a HR of 2.72 (95 % CI 2.22, 3.34) after adjusting for covariates. Participants with lower baseline 3MSE scores HR 1.39 (1.27, 1.51), lower DSST scores <34 HR 1.69(1.54, 1.85) were more likely deceased.
CEA patients are at increased risk of lower scores on 3MSE and DSST testing in the long term. Mortality in the CHS cohort was higher in participants who underwent CEA. Further, lower 3MSE and DSST scores increased the risk of mortality.
迄今为止,尚无研究评估颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后长期认知能力下降的情况。我们评估了接受 CEA 的患者与未接受 CEA 的患者相比,是否有更高的认知能力下降风险。
本研究的患者为心血管健康研究(CHS)的参与者,该研究是一项针对 5201 名年龄在 65 岁以上的男性和女性的研究,他们于 1988-89 年从四个社区(宾夕法尼亚州的匹兹堡、加利福尼亚州的萨克拉门托、北卡罗来纳州的温斯顿-塞勒姆和马里兰州的黑格斯敦)招募而来。测量的结果是:1)与 CEA 前相比,CEA 后 3MSE 和数字符号替代测试(DSST)评分的下降情况。2)在 CHS 队列中,CEA 患者和未接受 CEA 的患者的全因死亡率。
CEA 患者的 DSST 评分每年下降幅度明显更大-2.43(SD 4.21),而未接受 CEA 的患者为-1.1(SD 2.57)(p<0.001),但在 3MSE 评分中并未观察到这种情况。在调整年龄、性别、种族和教育程度后,CEA 患者的 DSST(OR 2.41,95%CI 1.49,3.88)和 3MSE(OR 2.17,95%CI 1.35,3.48)评分下降的风险增加。在调整协变量后,CEA 与长期全因死亡率相关,HR 为 2.72(95%CI 2.22,3.34)。在基线时 3MSE 评分较低的患者 HR 为 1.39(1.27,1.51),DSST 评分<34 的患者 HR 为 1.69(1.54,1.85),这些患者的死亡率更高。
在长期内,CEA 患者在 3MSE 和 DSST 测试中的得分较低的风险增加。接受 CEA 的 CHS 队列参与者的死亡率更高。此外,较低的 3MSE 和 DSST 评分增加了死亡率的风险。