Suppr超能文献

睡眠剥夺期间保持警觉性和工作表现:莫达非尼与咖啡因的比较

Maintaining alertness and performance during sleep deprivation: modafinil versus caffeine.

作者信息

Wesensten Nancy Jo, Belenky Gregory, Kautz Mary A, Thorne David R, Reichardt Rebecca M, Balkin Thomas J

机构信息

Department of Neurobiology and Behaviour, Division of Neuropsychiatry, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, 503 Robert Grant Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20910-7500, USA.

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2002 Jan;159(3):238-47. doi: 10.1007/s002130100916. Epub 2001 Oct 19.

Abstract

RATIONALE

The performance and alertness effects of modafinil were evaluated to determine whether modafinil should replace caffeine for restoring performance and alertness during total sleep deprivation in otherwise healthy adults.

OBJECTIVES

Study objectives were to determine (a) the relative efficacy of three doses of modafinil versus an active control dose of caffeine 600 mg; (b) whether modafinil effects are dose-dependent; and (c) the extent to which both agents maintain performance and alertness during the circadian trough.

METHODS

Fifty healthy young adults remained awake for 54.5 h (from 6:30 a.m. day 1 to 1:00 p.m. on day 3) and performance and alertness tests were administered bi-hourly from 8:00 a.m. day 1 until 10:00 p.m. day 2. At 11:55 p.m. on day 2 (after 41.5 h awake), subjects received double blind administration of one of five drug doses: placebo; modafinil 100, 200, or 400 mg; or caffeine 600 mg ( n=10 per group), followed by hourly testing from midnight through 12:00 p.m. on day 3.

RESULTS

Performance and alertness were significantly improved by modafinil 200 and 400 mg relative to placebo, and effects were comparable to those obtained with caffeine 600 mg. Although a trend toward better performance at higher modafinil doses suggested a dose-dependent effect, differences between modafinil doses were not significant. Performance enhancing effects were especially salient during the circadian nadir (6:00 a.m. through 10:00 a.m.). Few instances of adverse subjective side effects (nausea, heart pounding) were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Like caffeine, modafinil maintained performance and alertness during the early morning hours, when the combined effects of sleep loss and the circadian trough of performance and alertness trough were manifest. Thus, equivalent performance- and alertness-enhancing effects were obtained with drugs possessing different mechanisms of action. However, modafinil does not appear to offer advantages over caffeine (which is more readily available and less expensive) for improving performance and alertness during sleep loss in otherwise normal, healthy adults.

摘要

理论依据

对莫达非尼的性能及警觉性影响进行评估,以确定在其他方面健康的成年人完全睡眠剥夺期间,莫达非尼是否应取代咖啡因来恢复性能及警觉性。

目的

研究目的是确定:(a)三种剂量的莫达非尼与600毫克咖啡因活性对照剂量的相对疗效;(b)莫达非尼的效果是否具有剂量依赖性;(c)两种药物在昼夜节律低谷期间维持性能及警觉性的程度。

方法

50名健康的年轻成年人保持清醒54.5小时(从第1天上午6:30至第3天下午1:00),从第1天上午8:00至第2天晚上10:00每两小时进行一次性能及警觉性测试。在第2天晚上11:55(清醒41.5小时后),受试者接受五种药物剂量之一的双盲给药:安慰剂;100、200或400毫克莫达非尼;或600毫克咖啡因(每组n = 10),随后从午夜至第3天中午12:00每小时进行一次测试。

结果

与安慰剂相比,200毫克和400毫克莫达非尼显著改善了性能和警觉性,其效果与600毫克咖啡因相当。尽管较高剂量莫达非尼有性能改善趋势表明存在剂量依赖性效应,但莫达非尼各剂量之间的差异并不显著。在昼夜节律最低点(上午6:00至上午10:00)期间,性能增强效果尤为显著。报告的不良主观副作用(恶心、心跳加速)情况很少。

结论

与咖啡因一样,莫达非尼在清晨时段维持了性能和警觉性,此时睡眠剥夺与性能及警觉性昼夜节律低谷的综合影响明显。因此,具有不同作用机制的药物获得了同等的性能和警觉性增强效果。然而,对于在其他方面正常、健康的成年人睡眠剥夺期间改善性能和警觉性而言,莫达非尼似乎并不比咖啡因(更易获取且成本更低)有优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验