Munro R, Mallon R
Br J Vener Dis. 1979 Dec;55(6):404-7. doi: 10.1136/sti.55.6.404.
In a comparison of the reverse passive haemagglutination test (RPHA) with the direct immunofluorescent and rapid carbohydrate utilisation tests for the identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolated from clinical specimens, 315 isolates of oxidase-positive Gram-negative diplococci were tested as pure 24-hour-old subcultures and samples from 108 similar organisms were taken directly from primary isolation plates. A similar test system was used to detect penicillinase production. Results showed agreement in 97.8% of organisms tested with the RPHA and conventional methods for identification of N. gonorrhoeae; similarly there was good agreement with conventional methods for detection of penicillinase production. The test was reliable and could be read within four hours; a result was therefore available on the same day the clinical specimen was received. The time and work involved in identifying N. gonorrhoeae using the RPHA was less than with conventional methods, but differentiation between N. gonorrhoeae and other Neisseria species from throat swabs proved difficult.
在比较反向被动血凝试验(RPHA)与直接免疫荧光试验及快速碳水化合物利用试验以鉴定从临床标本中分离出的淋病奈瑟菌时,315株氧化酶阳性革兰氏阴性双球菌作为24小时纯培养物进行检测,108株类似菌的样本则直接取自初次分离平板。使用类似的检测系统来检测青霉素酶的产生。结果显示,在检测的菌株中,97.8%的淋病奈瑟菌通过RPHA和传统鉴定方法结果一致;同样,在检测青霉素酶产生方面,与传统方法也有良好的一致性。该试验可靠,4小时内即可读取结果;因此在收到临床标本的当天就能得到结果。使用RPHA鉴定淋病奈瑟菌所花费的时间和工作量比传统方法少,但要区分淋病奈瑟菌与咽喉拭子中的其他奈瑟菌属菌种却很困难。