Suppr超能文献

门诊静脉采血的成功率及标本拒收原因。

Outpatient phlebotomy success and reasons for specimen rejection.

作者信息

Dale Jane C, Novis David A

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002 Apr;126(4):416-9. doi: 10.5858/2002-126-0416-OPSARF.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the rate with which blood collection is successful on the initial phlebotomy encounter, the rate with which laboratory personnel judge specimens unsuitable for analysis, and the practice characteristics associated with fewer unsuccessful collections and fewer rejected specimens.

DESIGN

Clinical laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists Q-Probes laboratory improvement program prospectively characterized the outcome of outpatient phlebotomies for 3 months or until 20 unsuccessful phlebotomy encounters occurred. By questionnaire, participants provided information about test ordering, patient preparation, and specimen collection.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Institutions in the United States (n = 202), Canada (n = 4), Australia (n = 3), and South Korea (n = 1).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Percentage of successful encounters and percentage of unsuitable specimens.

RESULTS

Of 833289 encounters, 829723 were successful. Phlebotomies were unsuccessful because patients were not fasting as directed (32.2%), phlebotomy orders were missing information (22.5%), patients specimens were difficult to draw (13.0%), patients left the collection area before specimens were collected (11.8%), patients were improperly prepared for reasons other than fasting (6.3%), patients presented at the wrong time (3.1%), or for other reasons (11.8%). Only 2153 specimens (0.3%) were unsuitable; these samples were hemolyzed (18.1%), of insufficient quantity (16.0%), clotted (13.4%), lost or not received in the laboratory (11.5%), inadequately labeled (5.8%), at variance with previous or expected results (4.8%), or unacceptable for other reasons (31.1%). Facilities staffed by laboratory-administered phlebotomists reported higher success rates than facilities staffed by nonlaboratory-administered phlebotomists (P =.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Most outpatient phlebotomy encounters are successful and result in specimens suitable for laboratory analysis.

摘要

目的

确定首次静脉穿刺采血成功的比例、实验室人员判定标本不适于分析的比例,以及与较少的采血失败和较少的拒收标本相关的实践特征。

设计

参与美国病理学家学会Q-Probes实验室改进计划的临床实验室前瞻性地对门诊静脉穿刺采血的结果进行了为期3个月的特征描述,或直至发生20次静脉穿刺采血失败。通过问卷调查,参与者提供了有关检验医嘱、患者准备和标本采集的信息。

地点和参与者

美国的机构(n = 202)、加拿大的机构(n = 4)、澳大利亚的机构(n = 3)和韩国的机构(n = 1)。

主要观察指标

成功采血的比例和不适宜标本的比例。

结果

在833289次采血中,829723次成功。采血失败的原因包括患者未按指示禁食(32.2%)、静脉穿刺医嘱缺少信息(22.5%)、患者标本难以采集(13.0%)、患者在标本采集前离开采集区(11.8%)、患者因禁食以外的原因准备不当(6.3%)、患者就诊时间错误(3.1%)或其他原因(11.8%)。只有2153份标本(0.3%)不适宜;这些样本存在溶血(18.1%)、量不足(16.0%)、凝血(13.4%)、在实验室丢失或未收到(11.5%)、标签标注不充分(5.8%)、与先前或预期结果不符(4.8%)或因其他原因不可接受(31.1%)的情况。由实验室管理的采血人员配备的机构报告的成功率高于非实验室管理的采血人员配备的机构(P = 0.002)。

结论

大多数门诊静脉穿刺采血是成功的,并获得了适于实验室分析的标本。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验