van Assema P, Brug J, Ronda G, Steenhuis I
Department of Health Education and Promotion, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2001 Oct;14(5):377-90. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-277x.2001.00310.x.
To assess the relative validity of a short food frequency questionnaire, the Fat list, to be used in (the evaluation of) nutrition education programmes.
Forty-five adults and 50 adolescents (12-18 years old) completed the Fat list at home, and subsequently kept diet records for seven subsequent days.
Pearson correlations of about 0.7 for adults and 0.6 for adolescents were observed between fat scores derived from the Fat list and total and saturated fat intake in grams estimated by the 7-day diet records. Correlations varied among subpopulations based on sex, age, education, household size and responsibility for cooking and shopping. Lower correlations were especially found for female adolescents and older adolescents (16-18 years old). Pearson correlations between the Fat list and percentages energy from fat were low for both adults and adolescents. Gross misclassification, defined as disagreement between the two fat consumption assessments beyond an adjacent tertile, was less than 6% for all but the female adolescents.
The Fat list can be used in adult and male adolescent populations to classify subjects in broad categories of total and saturated fat intake in grams and to assess differences in absolute and saturated fat intake between groups as a result of nutrition education programmes.
为评估用于营养教育项目（评估）的简短食物频率问卷“脂肪清单”的相对效度。
45名成年人和50名青少年（12 - 18岁）在家中完成“脂肪清单”，随后连续7天记录饮食。
“脂肪清单”得出的脂肪得分与7天饮食记录估计的总脂肪摄入量和饱和脂肪摄入量（克数）之间，成年人的皮尔逊相关系数约为0.7，青少年约为0.6。基于性别、年龄、教育程度、家庭规模以及烹饪和购物责任的亚组之间，相关性有所不同。尤其是女性青少年和年龄较大的青少年（16 - 18岁）的相关性较低。“脂肪清单”与脂肪能量百分比之间，成年人和青少年的皮尔逊相关系数均较低。除女性青少年外，所有人群中，两种脂肪摄入量评估结果相差超过相邻三分位数的严重错误分类率均低于6%。
“脂肪清单”可用于成年人群和男性青少年人群，将受试者按总脂肪摄入量和饱和脂肪摄入量（克数）的大致类别进行分类，并评估营养教育项目导致的不同组间绝对脂肪摄入量和饱和脂肪摄入量的差异。
