Lafortuna C L, Fumagalli E, Vangeli V, Sartorio A
Institute of Bioimaging and Molecular Physiology, CNR, Segrate, Milano, Italy.
J Endocrinol Invest. 2002 Feb;25(2):134-41. doi: 10.1007/BF03343977.
Short-term alactic anaerobic performance in jumping (5 consecutive jumps with maximal effort), sprint running (8 m) and stair climbing (modified Margaria test) were measured in 75 obese subjects (BMI: 40.3+/-5.0 kg/m2) and in 36 lean control subjects (BMI: 22.4+/-3.2 kg/m2) of the same age and gender distribution. The results show that obese subjects attained a significantly lower specific (per unit body mass) power output both in jumping (W(spec,j); p<0.001) and stair climbing (W(spec,s); p<0.001) and run at a significantly lower average velocity (v; p<0.001) during sprinting. In spite of the different motor skillfulness required to accomplish the jumping and climbing tests, W(spec,s) (and hence the vertical velocity in climbing, v(v)) was closely correlated with W(spec,j) (R2=0.427, p<0.001). In jumping, although the average force during the positive work phase was significantly higher in obese subjects (p<0.001), no difference between the 2 groups was detected in absolute power. In stair climbing the absolute power output of obese resulted significantly higher (18%) than that of lean controls (p<0.001). In sprint running, the lower average horizontal velocity attained by obese subjects also entailed a different locomotion pattern with shorter step length (L(s); p<0.001), lower frequency (p<0.001) and longer foot contact time with ground (T(c,r); p<0.001). W(spec,j) seems to be a determinant of the poorer motor performance of obese, being significantly correlated with: I) the vertical displacement of the centre of gravity (R2=0.853, p<0.001) in jumping; II) with v(v) in stair climbing; and III) with T(c,r) (R2=0.492, p<0.001), L(s) (R2=0.266, p<0.001) and v (R2=0.454, p<0.001) in sprinting. The results suggest that obese individuals, although partially hampered in kinetic movements, largely rely on their effective specific power output to perform complex anaerobic tasks, and they suffer from the disproportionate excess of inert mass of fat. Furthermore, in view of the sedentary style of life and the consequent degree of muscle de-conditioning accompanying this condition, it may prove useful to implement rehabilitation programs for obesity with effective power training protocols.
对75名肥胖受试者(BMI:40.3±5.0kg/m²)和36名年龄及性别分布相同的瘦体重对照受试者(BMI:22.4±3.2kg/m²)进行了跳跃(5次最大努力连续跳跃)、短跑(8米)和爬楼梯(改良马加里亚测试)的短期非乳酸无氧运动表现测量。结果显示,肥胖受试者在跳跃(W(spec,j);p<0.001)和爬楼梯(W(spec,s);p<0.001)时获得的单位体重功率输出显著更低,并且在短跑时平均速度显著更低(v;p<0.001)。尽管完成跳跃和爬楼梯测试所需的运动技能不同,但W(spec,s)(以及因此爬楼梯时垂直速度,v(v))与W(spec,j)密切相关(R²=0.427,p<0.001)。在跳跃中,尽管肥胖受试者在正功阶段的平均力显著更高(p<0.001),但两组在绝对功率方面未检测到差异。在爬楼梯时,肥胖者的绝对功率输出比瘦体重对照者显著更高(18%)(p<0.001)。在短跑中,肥胖受试者达到的较低平均水平速度也导致其运动模式不同,步长更短(L(s);p<0.001)、频率更低(p<0.001)且与地面的足部接触时间更长(T(c,r);p<0.001)。W(spec,j)似乎是肥胖者运动表现较差的一个决定因素,与以下因素显著相关:I)跳跃时重心的垂直位移(R²=0.853,p<0.001);II)爬楼梯时的v(v);以及III)短跑时的T(c,r)(R²=0.492,p<0.001)、L(s)(R²=0.266,p<0.001)和v(R²=0.454,p<0.001)。结果表明,肥胖个体尽管在动力运动中部分受阻,但在很大程度上依靠其有效的单位体重功率输出执行复杂的无氧任务,并且他们受到脂肪惰性质量不成比例的过量影响。此外,鉴于这种情况下的久坐生活方式以及随之而来的肌肉失适应程度,实施有效的功率训练方案的肥胖康复计划可能被证明是有用的。