Vowden K R, Mason A, Wilkinson D, Vowden P
Department of Vascular Surgery, Bradford Royal Infirmary, UK.
J Wound Care. 2000 Jun;9(6):269-72. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2000.9.6.25992.
This randomised controlled study compares the healing rates, complications and patient and staff acceptability of three four-layer bandage regimens for leg ulcers. A total of 149 patients were recruited into the study, of whom 50 received the original Charing Cross system (CX4L), 50 a modified Charing Cross system (Parema) and 49 a commercially available kit, Robinson Ultra Four (Robinson). No significant difference was found in the healing rates of the three systems. Overall 12 weeks' healing was 65%, while the 20-week healing rates for the individual systems were 87% (CX4L), 84% (Parema) and 83% (Robinson). Analysis of known risk factors for delayed healing showed that no bandaging system had an advantage over the others. Staff familiarity resulted in an initial preference for the CX4L but there was no bandage preference by the end of the study. The data suggest that none of the systems has an advantage over the others and that cost savings can be made by pursuing a competitive pricing policy.
这项随机对照研究比较了用于腿部溃疡的三种四层绷带方案的愈合率、并发症以及患者和医护人员的接受度。共有149名患者被纳入该研究,其中50人接受原始的查令十字系统(CX4L),50人接受改良的查令十字系统(Parema),49人接受市售套装产品罗宾逊超级四层绷带(Robinson)。三种系统的愈合率未发现显著差异。总体而言,12周的愈合率为65%,而各系统20周的愈合率分别为87%(CX4L)、84%(Parema)和83%(Robinson)。对已知的延迟愈合风险因素进行分析表明,没有一种绷带系统比其他系统更具优势。医护人员的熟悉程度导致最初对CX4L有偏好,但在研究结束时没有绷带偏好。数据表明,没有一种系统比其他系统更具优势,通过推行竞争性定价政策可以节省成本。