Nelson E Andrea
University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
BMJ Clin Evid. 2011 Dec 21;2011:1902.
Leg ulcers usually occur secondary to venous reflux or obstruction, but 20% of people with leg ulcers have arterial disease, with or without venous disorders. Between 1.5 and 3.0/1000 people have active leg ulcers. Prevalence increases with age to about 20/1000 in people aged over 80 years.
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of standard treatments, adjuvant treatments, and organisational interventions for venous leg ulcers? What are the effects of advice about self-help interventions in people receiving usual care for venous leg ulcers? What are the effects of interventions to prevent recurrence of venous leg ulcers? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to June 2011 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
We found 101 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: compression bandages and stockings, cultured allogenic (single or bilayer) skin replacement, debriding agents, dressings (cellulose, collagen, film, foam, hyaluronic acid-derived, semi-occlusive alginate), hydrocolloid (occlusive) dressings in the presence of compression, intermittent pneumatic compression, intravenous prostaglandin E1, larval therapy, laser treatment (low-level), leg ulcer clinics, multilayer elastic system, multilayer elastomeric (or non-elastomeric) high-compression regimens or bandages, oral treatments (aspirin, flavonoids, pentoxifylline, rutosides, stanozolol, sulodexide, thromboxane alpha(2) antagonists, zinc), peri-ulcer injection of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, self-help (advice to elevate leg, to keep leg active, to modify diet, to stop smoking, to reduce weight), short-stretch bandages, single-layer non-elastic system, skin grafting, superficial vein surgery, systemic mesoglycan, therapeutic ultrasound, and topical treatments (antimicrobial agents, autologous platelet lysate, calcitonin gene-related peptide plus vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, freeze-dried keratinocyte lysate, mesoglycan, negative pressure, recombinant keratinocyte growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor).
腿部溃疡通常继发于静脉反流或阻塞,但20%的腿部溃疡患者患有动脉疾病,伴或不伴有静脉疾病。每1000人中就有1.5至3.0人患有活动性腿部溃疡。患病率随年龄增长而增加,80岁以上人群中约为每1000人中有20人患病。
我们进行了一项系统评价,旨在回答以下临床问题:标准治疗、辅助治疗和组织干预对下肢静脉溃疡有何影响?对于接受下肢静脉溃疡常规护理的患者,自助干预建议有何影响?预防下肢静脉溃疡复发的干预措施有何影响?我们检索了:截至2011年6月的Medline、Embase、Cochrane图书馆及其他重要数据库(Clinical Evidence综述会定期更新;请查看我们的网站获取本综述的最新版本)。我们纳入了来自美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和英国药品及医疗产品监管局(MHRA)等相关组织的危害警示。
我们发现101项系统评价、随机对照试验或观察性研究符合我们的纳入标准。我们对干预措施的证据质量进行了GRADE评估。
在本系统评价中,我们呈现了以下干预措施的有效性和安全性相关信息:加压绷带和弹力袜、培养的同种异体(单层或双层)皮肤替代物、清创剂、敷料(纤维素、胶原蛋白、薄膜、泡沫、透明质酸衍生物、半封闭藻酸盐)、在加压情况下使用的水胶体(封闭性)敷料、间歇性气动加压、静脉注射前列腺素E1、蛆虫疗法、激光治疗(低强度)、腿部溃疡诊所、多层弹性系统、多层弹性(或非弹性)高压缩方案或绷带、口服治疗(阿司匹林、类黄酮、己酮可可碱、芸香苷、司坦唑醇、舒洛地昔、血栓素α2拮抗剂、锌)、溃疡周围注射粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子、自助(抬高腿部、保持腿部活动、调整饮食、戒烟、减肥的建议)、短拉伸绷带、单层非弹性系统、皮肤移植、浅静脉手术、全身用葡糖胺聚糖、治疗性超声以及局部治疗(抗菌剂、自体血小板裂解物、降钙素基因相关肽加血管活性肠肽、冻干角质形成细胞裂解物、葡糖胺聚糖、负压、重组角质形成细胞生长因子、血小板衍生生长因子)。