Riddle Mark S, Jackson Jeffrey L, Sanders John W, Blazes David L
Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, 20814-4799 , USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2002 May 1;34(9):1192-8. doi: 10.1086/339810. Epub 2002 Apr 3.
The efficacy of exchange transfusion as an adjunct treatment for severe falciparum malaria is controversial. No sufficiently powered, randomized, controlled study has been reported. We analyzed 8 studies that compared survival rates associated with adjunct exchange transfusion with those associated with antimalarial chemotherapy alone. Exchange transfusion was not associated with a higher survival rate than was antimalarial chemotherapy alone (odds ratio [OR], 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7-2.1). However, patients who received transfusions had higher levels of parasitemia and more-severe malaria. Sensitivity analysis found that survival rates were higher among patients with partial immunity to malaria (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.2-1.2) than they were among patients with no immunity (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 0.9-4.8; P=.007). Exchange transfusion does not appear to increase the survival rate; however, there were significant problems with the comparability of treatment groups in the studies reviewed, and a randomized controlled trial is necessary to determine whether exchange transfusion is beneficial.
换血疗法作为重症恶性疟辅助治疗手段的疗效存在争议。尚无充分有力的随机对照研究报告。我们分析了8项研究,这些研究比较了辅助换血疗法与单纯抗疟化疗的生存率。与单纯抗疟化疗相比,换血疗法并未带来更高的生存率(优势比[OR]为1.2;95%置信区间[CI]为0.7 - 2.1)。然而,接受输血的患者疟原虫血症水平更高,疟疾病情更严重。敏感性分析发现,对疟疾有部分免疫力的患者生存率更高(OR为0.5;95%CI为0.2 - 1.2),高于无免疫力的患者(OR为2.1;95%CI为0.9 - 4.8;P = 0.007)。换血疗法似乎并未提高生存率;然而,在所审查的研究中,治疗组的可比性存在重大问题,因此有必要进行一项随机对照试验来确定换血疗法是否有益。