Bänffer J R, Raghoenath S, Hulst A M
J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Nov;2(5):361-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.2.5.361-367.1975.
The counter-immunoelectrophoresis technique with the Reiter protein (RP-CIE) was compared with two complement fixation tests (Kolmer and RPCF) and a flocculation test (VDRL) in sensitivity and specificity. Of the 1,927 consecutive attendants of a venereal disease clinic whose serum samples were used, 250 were considered to be syphilitic. The number of true-positive and false-positive reactions were: 121 and 4 (VDRL), 124 and 2 (Kolmer), 179 and 41 (RPCF), 166 and 16 (RP-CIE). The VDRL and the RPCF combined were more sensitive and less specific than the VDRL combined with the Kolmer. If the RPCF was replaced by the RP-CIE the sensitivity remained the same but the specificity was higher. The RP-CIE scored more positives than the RPCF in untreated cases of primary syphilis. The results argue for substitution of the RP-CIE for the Kolmer in the combination with the VDRL in the serodiagnosis for syphilis. Moreover, the RP-CIE presents the technical advantages of simplicity, speed of performance, and of not being hampered by the anticomplementary nature of the serum sample.
将赖特蛋白反向免疫电泳技术(RP-CIE)与两种补体结合试验(柯尔默试验和RPCF)以及一种絮状试验(VDRL)在敏感性和特异性方面进行了比较。在一家性病诊所连续就诊的1927名患者中,其血清样本被用于检测,其中250人被认为患有梅毒。真阳性和假阳性反应的数量分别为:VDRL试验121例真阳性和4例假阳性,柯尔默试验124例真阳性和2例假阳性,RPCF试验179例真阳性和41例假阳性,RP-CIE试验166例真阳性和16例假阳性。VDRL试验与RPCF试验联合使用比VDRL试验与柯尔默试验联合使用更敏感,但特异性更低。如果用RP-CIE试验取代RPCF试验,敏感性不变,但特异性更高。在一期梅毒未经治疗的病例中,RP-CIE试验比RPCF试验检测出的阳性更多。结果表明,在梅毒血清学诊断中,RP-CIE试验与VDRL试验联合使用时可取代柯尔默试验。此外,RP-CIE试验具有操作简单、检测速度快以及不受血清样本抗补体性质影响等技术优势。