Wilkinson A E, Scrimgeour G, Rodin P
J Clin Pathol. 1972 May;25(5):437-40. doi: 10.1136/jcp.25.5.437.
Screening tests-absorbed fluorescent treponemal (FTA-ABS), the Reiter protein complement-fixation (RPCFT), VDRL slide test, automated reagin-and cardiolipin Wassermann reaction-were carried out on 1922 consecutive new patients attending the Whitechapel Clinic over a three-month period.Taking the FTA-ABS test results as an index, the most efficient combination of conventional tests was found to be the RPCFT and automated reagin test. The cardiolipin WR proved to be under-sensitive and of little value compared with the other tests.Forty-two per cent of the 107 sera reactive in the FTA-ABS test were not detected by the RPCFT or ART tests. An assessment based on the TPI test results and clinical findings in these patients is presented. The scope and limitations of the FTA-ABS test as a screening procedure are discussed.
对连续三个月到白教堂诊所就诊的1922名新患者进行了筛查试验——吸收荧光密螺旋体抗体试验(FTA - ABS)、赖特蛋白补体结合试验(RPCFT)、性病研究实验室玻片试验、自动反应素和心磷脂瓦色曼反应。以FTA - ABS试验结果为指标,发现传统试验最有效的组合是RPCFT和自动反应素试验。与其他试验相比,心磷脂瓦色曼反应被证明敏感性不足且价值不大。在FTA - ABS试验中呈阳性反应的107份血清中,有42%未被RPCFT或自动反应素试验检测到。本文基于这些患者的梅毒螺旋体免疫试验(TPI)结果和临床发现进行了评估。讨论了FTA - ABS试验作为一种筛查程序的范围和局限性。