Hill Andrew
Department of Sociology, University of Reading.
Br J Sociol. 2002 Mar;53(1):89-105. doi: 10.1080/00071310120109348.
This paper examines why the late 1980s youth subculture Acid House provoked a moral panic of the scale and intensity that it did. The subculture is conceived as presenting a disruptive presence to Thatcherism as an hegemonic project. The terms under which this occurred are examined through the themes of noise, the mob, and the disruption of bureaucratic authority. The presence of Acid House within the English countryside, and in particular the Home Counties, is situated as enhancing the problematic status of the subculture. The scale of measures taken against Acid House is related to Thatcherism's 'authoritarian populism'. Acid House is located in terms of a history of similar forms of popular cultural activity. The coverage of Acid House in The Sun and The Daily Mail, and the parliamentary debate around the second reading of the Entertainments (Increased Penalties) Act, are drawn upon throughout.
本文探讨了为何20世纪80年代末的青年亚文化“酸屋”会引发如此规模和强度的道德恐慌。该亚文化被视为对作为霸权项目的撒切尔主义构成了颠覆性存在。通过噪音、暴民以及官僚权威的瓦解等主题来审视这一情况发生的条件。“酸屋”在英国乡村尤其是伦敦周围各郡的存在,加剧了该亚文化的问题性地位。针对“酸屋”采取措施的规模与撒切尔主义的“威权民粹主义”相关。“酸屋”是根据类似形式的流行文化活动历史来定位的。文中自始至终都引用了《太阳报》和《每日邮报》对“酸屋”的报道,以及围绕《娱乐(加重处罚)法案》二读的议会辩论。