Smith S G T, Torkington J, Brown T J, Taffinder N J, Darzi A
Department of Academic Surgery, Imperial College School of Medicine, 10th Floor, St. Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, United Kingdom.
Surg Endosc. 2002 Apr;16(4):640-5. doi: 10.1007/s004640080081. Epub 2001 Dec 17.
The ability to make an objective evaluation of a surgeon's operative ability remains an elusive goal. In this study, we used motion analysis as a measure of dexterity in the performance of a simulated operation.
Fifteen surgeons performed a total of 45 laboratory-based laparoscopic cholecystectomies on a cadaveric porcine liver model. Subjects were assigned to one of three groups according to their level of experience in human laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Electromagnetic tracking devices were used to analyze the surgeon's hand movements as they performed the procedure. Movement data (time, distance, number of movements, and speed of movement) were then compared.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) movement scores across the three groups showed significantly better performance among the experienced laparoscopic surgeons than the novices. Learning curves across repetitions of procedures were plotted. Novices made more improvement than experts.
Motion analysis provides useful data for the assessment of laparoscopic dexterity, and the porcine liver model is a valid simulation of the real procedure.
对外科医生手术能力进行客观评估的能力仍然是一个难以实现的目标。在本研究中,我们使用运动分析作为模拟手术操作中灵活性的一种度量方法。
15名外科医生在尸体猪肝模型上总共进行了45次基于实验室的腹腔镜胆囊切除术。根据他们在人类腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的经验水平,将受试者分为三组之一。在外科医生进行手术过程中,使用电磁跟踪设备分析其手部动作。然后比较运动数据(时间、距离、动作数量和运动速度)。
对三组的方差分析(ANOVA)运动评分显示,经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生的表现明显优于新手。绘制了手术重复过程中的学习曲线。新手比专家有更大的进步。
运动分析为评估腹腔镜手术灵活性提供了有用的数据,猪肝模型是真实手术的有效模拟。