• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优质心理健康服务的商业案例:雇主为何应关注员工的心理健康与福祉。

The business case for quality mental health services: why employers should care about the mental health and well-being of their employees.

作者信息

Goetzel Ron Z, Ozminkowski Ronald J, Sederer Lloyd I, Mark Tami L

机构信息

MEDSTAT Group, Inc, Washington, D.C., USA.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Med. 2002 Apr;44(4):320-30. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200204000-00012.

DOI:10.1097/00043764-200204000-00012
PMID:11977418
Abstract

Employers are very concerned about rising mental health care costs. They want to know whether their health care spending is improving the health of workers, and whether there is a productivity payback from providing good mental health care. This article addresses the subject of employee depression and its impact on business. The literature suggests that depressed individuals exert a significant cost burden for employers. Evidence is mounting that worker depression may have its greatest impact on productivity losses, including increased absenteeism and short-term disability, higher turnover, and suboptimal performance at work. Although there is no conclusive evidence yet that physical health care costs decrease when depression is effectively treated, there is growing evidence that productivity improvements occur as a consequence of effective treatment, and those improvements may offset the cost of the treatment.

摘要

雇主们非常担心心理健康护理成本的不断上升。他们想知道自己的医疗保健支出是否正在改善员工的健康状况,以及提供良好的心理健康护理是否能带来生产力回报。本文探讨了员工抑郁症及其对企业的影响这一主题。文献表明,抑郁症患者给雇主带来了巨大的成本负担。越来越多的证据表明,员工抑郁症可能对生产力损失产生最大影响,包括旷工增加、短期残疾、人员流动率升高以及工作表现欠佳。尽管尚无确凿证据表明有效治疗抑郁症会降低身体健康护理成本,但越来越多的证据表明,有效治疗会带来生产力的提高,而这些提高可能会抵消治疗成本。

相似文献

1
The business case for quality mental health services: why employers should care about the mental health and well-being of their employees.优质心理健康服务的商业案例:雇主为何应关注员工的心理健康与福祉。
J Occup Environ Med. 2002 Apr;44(4):320-30. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200204000-00012.
2
How much does quality mental health care profit employers?
J Occup Environ Med. 2005 Nov;47(11):1099-109. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000177124.60460.25.
3
Managing workplace depression: an untapped opportunity for occupational health professionals.应对职场抑郁症:职业健康专业人员尚未开发的机遇。
AAOHN J. 2004 Mar;52(3):122-9; quiz 130-1.
4
The cost of depression in the workplace.职场中抑郁症的代价。
Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 1995 Jul-Aug;4(4):25-7.
5
Modeling the impact of enhanced depression treatment on workplace functioning and costs: a cost-benefit approach.模拟强化抑郁症治疗对工作场所功能和成本的影响:一种成本效益方法。
Med Care. 2006 Apr;44(4):352-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000204049.30620.1e.
6
Employer burden of mild, moderate, and severe major depressive disorder: mental health services utilization and costs, and work performance.雇主承担轻度、中度和重度重度抑郁症的负担:精神卫生服务的利用和成本,以及工作表现。
Depress Anxiety. 2010;27(1):78-89. doi: 10.1002/da.20580.
7
Depression hurts, depression costs: The medical spending attributable to depression and depressive symptoms in China.抑郁症有害,抑郁症代价高昂:中国抑郁症及抑郁症状导致的医疗支出
Health Econ. 2018 Mar;27(3):525-544. doi: 10.1002/hec.3604. Epub 2017 Oct 8.
8
Health and disability costs of depressive illness in a major U.S. corporation.美国一家大型公司中抑郁症的健康和残疾成本。
Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Aug;157(8):1274-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.8.1274.
9
Promoting health and productivity for depressed patients in the workplace.提升职场中抑郁症患者的健康水平与工作效率。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2005 Apr;11(3 Suppl):S12-5. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2005.11.3.S12.
10
Design and development of a mental health assessment and intervention system.心理健康评估与干预系统的设计与开发
J Med Syst. 2007 Feb;31(1):49-62. doi: 10.1007/s10916-006-9042-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Mental health at work: a practical framework for employers.工作场所的心理健康:雇主实用框架
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 25;13:1552981. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1552981. eCollection 2025.
2
Exploring the Perceptions of Construction Workers and Senior Management Towards Mental Wellness Interventions Using Q-Methodology.运用Q方法探究建筑工人和高级管理人员对心理健康干预措施的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 31;22(1):52. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22010052.
3
A population health approach to workplace mental health: rationale, implementation and engagement.
一种针对职场心理健康的群体健康方法:基本原理、实施与参与
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 18;12:1336898. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1336898. eCollection 2024.
4
Evaluation of physical and mental health conditions related to employees' absenteeism.与员工旷工相关的身心健康状况评估。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 11;11:1326334. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1326334. eCollection 2023.
5
The Impact of a Workforce Mental Health Program on Employer Medical Plan Spend: An Application of Cost Efficiency Measurement for Mental Health Care.劳动力心理健康计划对雇主医疗计划支出的影响:心理健康护理成本效率衡量的应用。
Popul Health Manag. 2023 Feb;26(1):60-71. doi: 10.1089/pop.2022.0240.
6
Factors Associated With Time to Achieve Employment Through Occupational Support Programs in Patients With Mood Disorders: 1 Year Naturalistic Study.情绪障碍患者通过职业支持项目实现就业所需时间的相关因素:1年的自然主义研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 16;12:617640. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.617640. eCollection 2021.
7
Does Employee Care Trigger Innovation Under a Healthy and Safe Working Environment? Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry in China.在健康安全的工作环境下,员工关怀能否激发创新?来自中国制药行业的证据。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Feb 10;9(2):194. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9020194.
8
Definitions and Operationalization of Mental Health Problems, Wellbeing and Participation Constructs in Children with NDD: Distinctions and Clarifications.定义和操作化儿童神经发育障碍相关的心理健康问题、幸福感和参与构建:区别与澄清。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 9;18(4):1656. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041656.
9
Influencing subjective well-being for business and sustainable development using big data and predictive regression analysis.利用大数据和预测回归分析影响企业的主观幸福感与可持续发展。
J Bus Res. 2021 Jul;131:520-538. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.038. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
10
The American Heart Association 2030 Impact Goal: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association.美国心脏协会 2030 年影响目标:美国心脏协会主席顾问倡议
Circulation. 2020 Mar 3;141(9):e120-e138. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000758. Epub 2020 Jan 29.