Suppr超能文献

临床标本中中间普氏菌和变黑普氏菌的直接定量鉴别

Direct quantitative differentiation between Prevotella intermedia and Prevotella nigrescens in clinical specimens.

作者信息

Gmür Rudolf, Thurnheer Thomas

机构信息

Institute for Oral Microbiology and General Immunology, Centre for Dental, Oral Medicine and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Zürich, Plattenstrasse 11, CH-8028 Zürich, Switzerland1.

出版信息

Microbiology (Reading). 2002 May;148(Pt 5):1379-1387. doi: 10.1099/00221287-148-5-1379.

Abstract

This paper describes a quantitative fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) assay for the differential identification of Prevotella intermedia and Prevotella nigrescens in clinical samples, and compares its performance with less discriminatory culture and quantitative immunofluorescence (IF) assays. Fluorescence-labelled oligonucleotide probes directed to specific 16S rRNA sequences of P. intermedia, P. nigrescens, Prevotella pallens and Prevotella denticola were hybridized under stringent conditions with cultured reference strains or plaque samples from deep periodontal pockets. Probe specificity was defined with strains from multiple oral Prevotella species. The lower detection level of the assays was approximately 3x10(3) target cells per ml of plaque-sample suspension. P. intermedia, P. nigrescens, P. pallens and P. denticola were detected in plaques with prevalences of 69, 67, 0 and 28%, respectively. On average, 3.9 x 10(6) P. intermedia, 3.1 x 10(6) P. nigrescens and 5.6 x 10(5) P. denticola cells were counted per positive sample. All three species were found almost exclusively in dense mixed aggregates. Quantitative FISH data agreed satisfactorily with corresponding IF data (r=0.711). Both FISH and IF enumerations of the sum of P. intermedia and P. nigrescens markedly exceeded the c.f.u. counts of black-pigmented colonies in Porphyromonas gingivalis-free cultured subgingival plaques. The results demonstrate the validity of this new assay. Unlike established IF, culture, PCR or checkerboard DNA hybridization assays, this FISH assay differentiates quantitatively between P. intermedia and P. nigrescens, provides visual accuracy control, and offers insights into the spatial distribution of the target cells within a clinical sample.

摘要

本文描述了一种用于临床样本中差异鉴定中间普氏菌和变黑普氏菌的定量荧光原位杂交(FISH)检测方法,并将其性能与鉴别性较差的培养法和定量免疫荧光(IF)检测方法进行了比较。针对中间普氏菌、变黑普氏菌、苍白普氏菌和齿垢普氏菌特定16S rRNA序列的荧光标记寡核苷酸探针,在严格条件下与培养的参考菌株或来自深部牙周袋的菌斑样本进行杂交。用多种口腔普氏菌种的菌株确定探针特异性。这些检测方法的最低检测水平约为每毫升菌斑样本悬液3×10³个靶细胞。在菌斑中检测到中间普氏菌、变黑普氏菌、苍白普氏菌和齿垢普氏菌,其检出率分别为69%、67%、0和28%。每个阳性样本平均计数到3.9×10⁶个中间普氏菌、3.1×10⁶个变黑普氏菌和5.6×10⁵个齿垢普氏菌细胞。所有这三个菌种几乎都仅存在于密集的混合聚集体中。定量FISH数据与相应的IF数据令人满意地相符(r = 0.711)。中间普氏菌和变黑普氏菌总和的FISH和IF计数均明显超过无牙龈卟啉单胞菌培养的龈下菌斑中黑色色素菌落的菌落形成单位(c.f.u.)计数。结果证明了这种新检测方法的有效性。与既定的IF、培养、PCR或棋盘DNA杂交检测方法不同,这种FISH检测方法能在数量上区分中间普氏菌和变黑普氏菌,提供视觉准确性控制,并深入了解临床样本中靶细胞的空间分布。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验