• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Understanding employee awareness of health care quality information: how can employers benefit?了解员工对医疗保健质量信息的认知:雇主如何从中受益?
Health Serv Res. 2004 Dec;39(6 Pt 1):1799-815. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00319.x.
2
Do employees use report cards to assess health care provider systems?员工是否使用报告卡来评估医疗服务提供系统?
Health Serv Res. 2001 Jul;36(3):509-30.
3
Are employees informed about their health care coverage? Evidence from the buyers health care action group.员工是否了解他们的医保覆盖范围?来自购买者医疗行动小组的证据。
Manag Care Interface. 2005 Jul;18(7):29-36.
4
Early experience with employee choice of consumer-directed health plans and satisfaction with enrollment.员工选择消费者导向型健康计划的早期体验及对参保的满意度。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 2):1141-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00279.x.
5
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
6
Do consumers use information to choose a health-care provider system?消费者会利用信息来选择医疗服务提供体系吗?
Milbank Q. 2000;78(1):47-77, ii. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00161.
7
Direct contracting: a Minnesota case study.直接签约:明尼苏达州的一个案例研究。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1997 Aug;51(8):50-5.
8
The effect of quality information on consumer health plan switching: evidence from the Buyers Health Care Action Group.质量信息对消费者健康保险计划转换的影响:来自购买者医疗保健行动组织的证据。
J Health Econ. 2006 Jul;25(4):762-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.11.004. Epub 2006 May 15.
9
Employee choice of consumer-driven health insurance in a multiplan, multiproduct setting.在多计划、多产品环境下员工对消费者驱动型医疗保险的选择。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 2):1091-112. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00275.x.
10
Value-based formulas for purchasing. Employers shift to quality to evaluate and manage their health plans.基于价值的采购公式。雇主转向以质量来评估和管理他们的健康计划。
Manag Care Q. 1997 Winter;5(1):51-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Anyone Paying Attention to Physician Report Cards? The Impact of Increased Availability on Consumers' Awareness and Use of Physician Quality Information.有人关注医生成绩单吗?可获取性增加对消费者对医生质量信息的认知和使用的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug;52(4):1570-1589. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12540. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
2
What influences the awareness of physician quality information? Implications for Medicare.什么影响了医生质量信息的知晓度?对医疗保险的启示。
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2014 Jun 9;4(2). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.004.02.a02. eCollection 2014.
3
Experience with health coach-mediated physician referral in an employed insured population.在已参保人群中,健康教练介导的医生转介的经验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Oct;25(10):1071-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1428-4. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
4
Exporting the Buyers Health Care Action Group purchasing model: lessons from other communities.推广买家医疗保健行动小组的采购模式:来自其他社区的经验教训。
Milbank Q. 2005;83(1):149-76. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2005.00339.x.

本文引用的文献

1
How do patients choose physicians? Evidence from a national survey of enrollees in employment-related health plans.患者如何选择医生?来自一项针对参加与就业相关健康计划的参保人的全国性调查的证据。
Health Serv Res. 2003 Apr;38(2):711-32. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00141.
2
Consumer response to a report card comparing healthcare systems.消费者对一份比较医疗保健系统的报告卡的反应。
Am J Manag Care. 2002 Jun;8(6):522-8.
3
Similarities and differences in choosing health plans.选择健康保险计划的异同。
Med Care. 2002 Apr;40(4):289-302. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200204000-00005.
4
Evolution in the Buyers Health Care Action Group purchasing initiative.买家医疗保健行动小组采购计划的演变。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Jan-Feb;21(1):76-88. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.1.76.
5
Quality information and consumer health plan choices.质量信息与消费者健康计划选择。
J Health Econ. 2002 Jan;21(1):43-63. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00126-6.
6
The impact of health plan report cards on managed care enrollment.健康计划成绩单对管理式医疗参保率的影响。
J Health Econ. 2002 Jan;21(1):19-41. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00111-4.
7
Do employees use report cards to assess health care provider systems?员工是否使用报告卡来评估医疗服务提供系统?
Health Serv Res. 2001 Jul;36(3):509-30.
8
Prevalence of selected employer health insurance purchasing strategies in 1997.1997年特定雇主医疗保险购买策略的流行情况。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Jul-Aug;20(4):220-30. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.4.220.
9
Who uses flexible spending accounts: effects of employee characteristics and employer strategies.谁使用弹性支出账户:员工特征和雇主策略的影响。
Med Care. 2001 Jul;39(7):661-9. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200107000-00003.
10
Do consumer reports of health plan quality affect health plan selection?消费者对健康计划质量的报告是否会影响健康计划的选择?
Health Serv Res. 2000 Dec;35(5 Pt 1):933-47.

了解员工对医疗保健质量信息的认知:雇主如何从中受益?

Understanding employee awareness of health care quality information: how can employers benefit?

作者信息

Abraham Jean, Feldman Roger, Carlin Caroline

机构信息

Department of Healthcare Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2004 Dec;39(6 Pt 1):1799-815. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00319.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00319.x
PMID:15533188
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1361099/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the factors associated with employee awareness of employer-disseminated quality information on providers.

DATA SOURCES

Primary data were collected in 2002 on a stratified, random sample of 1,365 employees in 16 firms that are members of the Buyers Health Care Action Group (BHCAG) located in the Minneapolis-St. Paul region. An employer survey was also conducted to assess how employers communicated the quality information to employees.

STUDY DESIGN

In 2001, BHCAG sponsored two programs for reporting provider quality. We specify employee awareness of the quality information to depend on factors that influence the benefits and costs of search. Factors influencing the benefits include age, sex, provider satisfaction, health status, job tenure, and Twin Cities tenure. Factors influencing search costs include employee income, education, and employer communication strategies. We estimate the model using bivariate probit analysis.

DATA COLLECTION

Employee data were collected by phone survey.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Overall, the level of quality information awareness is low. However, employer communication strategies such as distributing booklets to all employees or making them available on request have a large effect on the probability of quality information awareness. Employee education and utilization of providers' services are also positively related to awareness.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is one of the first to investigate employee awareness of provider quality information. Given the direct implications for medical outcomes, one might anticipate higher rates of awareness regarding provider quality, relative to plan quality. However, we do not find empirical evidence to support this assertion.

摘要

目的

分析与员工对雇主发布的医疗服务提供者质量信息的认知相关的因素。

数据来源

2002年收集了位于明尼阿波利斯-圣保罗地区的16家公司(买家医疗保健行动组织(BHCAG)的成员)中1365名员工的分层随机样本的原始数据。还进行了一项雇主调查,以评估雇主如何向员工传达质量信息。

研究设计

2001年,BHCAG发起了两个报告医疗服务提供者质量的项目。我们将员工对质量信息的认知设定为取决于影响搜索收益和成本的因素。影响收益的因素包括年龄、性别、对医疗服务提供者的满意度、健康状况、工作任期和在双子城的居住期限。影响搜索成本的因素包括员工收入、教育程度和雇主的沟通策略。我们使用双变量概率分析来估计模型。

数据收集

通过电话调查收集员工数据。

主要发现

总体而言,质量信息认知水平较低。然而,雇主的沟通策略,如向所有员工分发手册或应要求提供手册,对质量信息认知的概率有很大影响。员工教育程度和对医疗服务提供者服务的使用也与认知呈正相关。

结论

本研究是最早调查员工对医疗服务提供者质量信息认知的研究之一。鉴于对医疗结果有直接影响,相对于计划质量,人们可能预期对医疗服务提供者质量的认知率会更高。然而,我们没有找到实证证据来支持这一断言。