Suppr超能文献

根管预备过程中有无根尖扩大时根管内细菌的减少情况。

Reduction in intracanal bacteria during root canal preparation with and without apical enlargement.

作者信息

Coldero L G, McHugh S, MacKenzie D, Saunders W P

机构信息

Dental School, University of Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 2002 May;35(5):437-46. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00496.x.

Abstract

AIM

To compare in vitro intracanal bacterial reduction using nickel-titanium rotary instruments with and without apical enlargement.

METHODOLOGY

Thirty-eight palatal roots of maxillary molar teeth, with mature apices were subdivided according to lengths and then randomly assigned to two experimental and one control groups. The roots were sterilized and then reinfected with Enterococcus faecalis, which served as a bacteriological marker. All roots in the experimental groups were prepared in a step-down sequence with engine-driven GT rotary files at 350 rpm. In experimental group A (n = 16) additional apical enlargement to ISO size 35 was performed. In group B (n = 16) a serial step-back technique was followed with no apical enlargement. This was combined in groups A and B with irrigation with NaOCl and EDTA. In the control group (group C, n = 6) irrigation only was carried out, with no mechanical preparation. Samples were then taken from the root canals to determine the numbers of remaining bacteria.

RESULTS

In groups A and B, 15 (94%) and 13 (81%) specimens were rendered bacteria-free, respectively. In the control group C none of the specimens were bacteria-free. There was a significant difference (P < 0.001) in the antibacterial effects of experimental and control regimens. There was, however, no significant difference (P = 0.276) between the preparation methods used in the experimental groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in intracanal bacterial reduction when Ni-Ti GT rotary preparation with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation was used with or without apical enlargement preparation technique. It may therefore not be necessary to remove dentine in the apical part of the root canal when a suitable coronal taper is achieved to allow satisfactory irrigation of the root canal system with antimicrobial agents.

摘要

目的

比较使用镍钛旋转器械进行根管预备时,有根尖扩大和无根尖扩大两种情况下根管内细菌减少的情况。

方法

选取38颗上颌磨牙腭根,根尖成熟,根据长度进行细分,然后随机分为两个试验组和一个对照组。将牙根消毒后,再用粪肠球菌重新感染,粪肠球菌作为细菌学标记物。试验组所有牙根均使用电动GT旋转锉以350 rpm的转速按逐步后退法进行预备。试验组A(n = 16)额外进行根尖扩大至ISO 35号。试验组B(n = 16)采用连续逐步后退技术,不进行根尖扩大。试验组A和B均联合使用次氯酸钠和乙二胺四乙酸进行冲洗。对照组(C组,n = 6)仅进行冲洗,不进行机械预备。然后从根管中取样以确定剩余细菌数量。

结果

试验组A和B中,分别有15例(94%)和13例(81%)标本无菌。对照组C中无一例标本无菌。试验组和对照组的抗菌效果存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。然而,试验组所采用的预备方法之间无显著差异(P = 0.276)。

结论

使用镍钛GT旋转预备联合次氯酸钠和乙二胺四乙酸冲洗时,无论有无根尖扩大预备技术,根管内细菌减少情况无显著差异。因此,当获得合适的冠部锥度以允许用抗菌剂充分冲洗根管系统时,可能无需去除根管根尖部的牙本质。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验