Neuberger John S, Gesell Thomas F
Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City 66160-7313, USA.
Health Phys. 2002 Jul;83(1):1-18. doi: 10.1097/00004032-200207000-00001.
Lung cancer is a disease that is almost entirely caused by smoking; hence, it is almost totally preventable. Yet there are a small percentage of cases, perhaps as many as 5 to 15%, where there are other causes. Risk factors identified for this other group include passive smoking, occupational exposure to certain chemicals and ionizing radiation, diet, and family history of cancer. In the United States cigarette smoking is on the decline among adults, occupational exposures are being reduced, and people are being made more aware of appropriate diets. These changes are gradually resulting in a reduced risk for this disease. Lung cancer in the U.S. may, therefore, eventually become largely a disease of the past. It remains important, however, to continue to study the cause(s) of lung cancer in non-smokers, particularly never smokers. Because of our interest in the effects of residential radon exposure on the development of lung cancer in non-smokers, we conducted a critical review of the scientific literature to evaluate this issue in detail. Strict criteria were utilized in selecting studies, which included being published in a peer reviewed journal, including non-smokers in the studied populations, having at least 100 cases, and being of case-control design. A total of 12 individual studies were found that met the criteria, with 10 providing some information on non-smokers. Most of these studies did not find any significant association between radon and lung cancer in non-smokers. Furthermore, data were not presented in sufficient detail for non-smokers in a number of studies. Based on the most recent findings, there is some evidence that radon may contribute to lung cancer risk in current smokers in high residential radon environments. The situation regarding the risk of lung cancer from radon in non-smokers (ex and never) is unclear, possibly because of both the relatively limited sample size of non-smokers and methodological limitations in most of the individual studies. A summary of these studies is provided concerning the state of knowledge of the lung cancer risk from radon, methodological problems with the residential studies, the need for the provision of additional data on non-smokers from researchers, and recommendations for future research in non-smokers.
肺癌几乎完全是由吸烟引起的疾病;因此,它几乎是完全可以预防的。然而,仍有一小部分病例,可能多达5%至15%,是由其他原因导致的。已确定的这一其他群体的风险因素包括被动吸烟、职业接触某些化学物质和电离辐射、饮食以及癌症家族史。在美国,成年人吸烟率正在下降,职业接触正在减少,人们对合理饮食的认识也在提高。这些变化正逐渐降低患这种疾病的风险。因此,美国的肺癌最终可能在很大程度上成为过去的一种疾病。然而,继续研究非吸烟者,尤其是从不吸烟者患肺癌的原因仍然很重要。由于我们对住宅氡暴露对非吸烟者肺癌发生的影响感兴趣,我们对科学文献进行了批判性综述,以详细评估这个问题。在选择研究时采用了严格的标准,包括发表在同行评审期刊上、研究人群中包括非吸烟者、至少有100个病例以及采用病例对照设计。总共发现12项个体研究符合标准,其中10项提供了一些关于非吸烟者的信息。这些研究中的大多数没有发现氡与非吸烟者肺癌之间有任何显著关联。此外,在一些研究中,没有足够详细地呈现非吸烟者的数据。根据最新研究结果,有一些证据表明,在住宅氡含量高的环境中,氡可能会增加当前吸烟者患肺癌的风险。非吸烟者(曾经吸烟和从不吸烟)因氡患肺癌的风险情况尚不清楚,可能是因为非吸烟者的样本量相对有限,而且大多数个体研究存在方法学上的局限性。本文提供了这些研究的总结,内容涉及氡导致肺癌风险的知识现状、住宅研究的方法学问题、研究人员提供更多非吸烟者数据的必要性以及对非吸烟者未来研究的建议。