Napp David, Gibbs Deborah, Jolly David, Westover Bonita, Uhl Gary
Practical Applications of Public Health, Durham, NC 27701, USA.
AIDS Educ Prev. 2002 Jun;14(3 Suppl A):38-48. doi: 10.1521/aeap.14.4.38.23884.
Funding agencies are using technical assistance to promote evaluation of their community-based HIV prevention programs. Using qualitative methods, we identified 11 factors that hinder and facilitate evaluation within community-based organizations (CBOs): staff perceptions, availability of funding, data collection, data validity, data utility, technical assistance, effects on services, effects on funding, staff skills, tools and technology, and expectations of the funding agency. Using these factors, we developed eight strategies to promote CBO evaluation. These strategies go beyond the traditional role of technical assistance and address the broader context within which CBOs evaluate their programs. Funding agencies and technical assistance providers can use these strategies to enhance CBO evaluation, which may result in more and better quality evaluations and, ultimately, improvements in the effectiveness of HIV prevention services.
资助机构正在利用技术援助来推动对其基于社区的艾滋病毒预防项目的评估。通过定性研究方法,我们确定了11个阻碍和促进社区组织(CBO)内部评估的因素:工作人员的认知、资金可用性、数据收集、数据有效性、数据实用性、技术援助、对服务的影响、对资金的影响、工作人员技能、工具和技术,以及资助机构的期望。利用这些因素,我们制定了八项促进社区组织评估的策略。这些策略超越了技术援助的传统作用,并解决了社区组织评估其项目的更广泛背景。资助机构和技术援助提供者可以利用这些策略来加强社区组织评估,这可能会带来更多、质量更高的评估,最终提高艾滋病毒预防服务的有效性。