Nair Bindu, Stapp Jenny, Stapp Lynn, Bugni Linda, Van Dalfsen Jill, Burns Jane L
Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle 98015, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Aug;40(8):2791-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.8.2791-2794.2002.
The microscopic examination of Gram-stained sputum specimens is very helpful in the evaluation of patients with community-acquired pneumonia and has also been recommended for use in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. This study was undertaken to evaluate that recommendation. One hundred one sputum samples from CF patients were cultured for gram-negative bacilli and examined by Gram staining for both sputum adequacy (using the quality [Q] score) and bacterial morphology. Subjective evaluation of adequacy was also performed and categorized. Based on Q score evaluation, 41% of the samples would have been rejected despite a subjective appearance of purulence. Only three of these rejected samples were culture negative for gram-negative CF pathogens. Correlation between culture results and quantitative Gram stain examination was also poor. These data suggest that subjective evaluation combined with comprehensive bacteriology is superior to Gram staining in identifying pathogens in CF sputum.
对革兰氏染色痰液标本进行显微镜检查,对社区获得性肺炎患者的评估非常有帮助,也被推荐用于囊性纤维化(CF)患者。本研究旨在评估这一推荐。对101份来自CF患者的痰液样本进行革兰氏阴性杆菌培养,并通过革兰氏染色检查痰液的充足性(使用质量[Q]评分)和细菌形态。还对痰液充足性进行了主观评估并分类。根据Q评分评估,尽管有41%的样本主观上看起来有脓性,但仍会被拒收。这些被拒收的样本中只有3份革兰氏阴性CF病原体培养呈阴性。培养结果与定量革兰氏染色检查之间的相关性也很差。这些数据表明,在识别CF痰液中的病原体方面,主观评估结合全面的细菌学检查优于革兰氏染色。