Gleckman R, DeVita J, Hibert D, Pelletier C, Martin R
Division of Infectious Disease, Saint Vincent Hospital, Worcester, Massachusetts 01604.
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 May;26(5):846-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.5.846-849.1988.
A prospective study was performed over a 4.5-year period to determine the ability of a sputum Gram stain to predict the cause of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. A blood culture isolate, rather than a sputum culture, served as the reference standard to provide precise identification of the etiologic agent. The study population comprised 59 bacteremic adults who expectorated a valid sputum sample. Data are presented that indicate that a physician, aided by the morphology of the stained sputum, could theoretically select appropriate monotherapy approximately 94% of the time when selective, defined criteria for the microbiology of valid sputum are met. Three of the five patients with pneumonia caused by Haemophilus influenzae, however, had sputum stains that suggested alternative pathogens. This study reaffirms that the Gram-stained sputum is a reliable, but not infallible, guide to direct initial antibiotic therapy in adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.
一项前瞻性研究历时4.5年,以确定痰革兰氏染色预测社区获得性细菌性肺炎病因的能力。以血培养分离物而非痰培养作为参考标准,以精确鉴定病原体。研究人群包括59名咳出有效痰标本的菌血症成年人。所呈现的数据表明,在满足有效痰微生物学的选择性、明确标准时,医生借助染色痰的形态,理论上大约94%的时间能够选择合适的单一疗法。然而,五名由流感嗜血杆菌引起肺炎的患者中有三名痰染色提示为其他病原体。这项研究再次证实,革兰氏染色痰对于指导社区获得性细菌性肺炎成人患者的初始抗生素治疗是可靠的,但并非绝对准确。