• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血压读数的选择性记录可能会增加随后的死亡率。

Selective recording in blood pressure readings may increase subsequent mortality.

作者信息

Wingfield D, Freeman G K, Bulpitt C J

机构信息

Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice and. Section of Care of the Elderly, Imperial College, Faculty of Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

QJM. 2002 Sep;95(9):571-7. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/95.9.571.

DOI:10.1093/qjmed/95.9.571
PMID:12205334
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rounding blood pressure (BP) to the nearest 10 mmHg (terminal digit preference) and selecting for particular values near treatment cut-offs (number preference) have both been previously described. Both reduce measurement accuracy, and may have consequences for treatment and survival.

AIM

To check for number preference in screening for hypertension, and whether this influenced subsequent mortality.

DESIGN

Prospective case-control screening study.

METHODS

In the General Practice Hypertensive Study Group (GPHSG), prospective case control study patients (n=23 574) were screened on one occasion for high phase-IV diastolic BP (DBP4) (> or =90 mmHg). Identified cases were matched with normotensive controls for age, sex, date of screen and ethnic group, and were registered for mortality follow-up (n=6310). Patients with a high DBP4 had two further readings, and were treated if it remained elevated.

RESULTS

For DBP4 terminal digit, '0' was over-represented (28.2% vs. 20%), and the number '88' was over-represented in both men and women. There was an excess adjusted death rate for females with DBP4 88-89 mmHg vs. 90-99 mmHg for both cardiovascular (RR 2.56, 95%CI 1.43-4.56, p=0.0015) and all-cause (1.56, 95%CI 1.06-2.29, p=0.023) mortality. For males, the corresponding rates were non-significantly reduced: cardiovascular RR 0.69, 95%CI 0.42-1.14, p=0.15; all-cause RR 0.93, 95%CI 0.68-1.27, p=0.64.

DISCUSSION

The quality of BP measurements should be monitored both in research studies and in clinical practice as part of clinical governance procedures.

摘要

背景

既往已描述了将血压(BP)取整至最接近的10 mmHg(尾数偏好)以及在治疗临界值附近选择特定数值(数字偏好)的情况。这两者均会降低测量准确性,并可能对治疗和生存产生影响。

目的

检查高血压筛查中的数字偏好,以及这是否会影响随后的死亡率。

设计

前瞻性病例对照筛查研究。

方法

在全科医疗高血压研究组(GPHSG)中,对前瞻性病例对照研究患者(n = 23574)进行一次筛查,以检测高IV期舒张压(DBP4)(≥90 mmHg)。将确诊病例与血压正常的对照者按年龄、性别、筛查日期和种族进行匹配,并登记进行死亡率随访(n = 6310)。DBP4高的患者再进行两次读数,如果血压仍升高则进行治疗。

结果

对于DBP4的尾数,“0”出现的比例过高(28.2%对20%),并且数字“88”在男性和女性中出现的比例均过高。DBP4为88 - 89 mmHg的女性与90 - 99 mmHg的女性相比,心血管疾病(RR 2.56,95%CI 1.43 - 4.56,p = 0.0015)和全因死亡率(1.56,95%CI 1.06 - 2.29,p = 0.023)的调整死亡率均过高。对于男性,相应的比率无显著降低:心血管疾病RR 0.69,95%CI 0.42 - 1.14,p = 0.15;全因RR 0.93,95%CI 0.68 - 1.27,p = 0.64。

讨论

作为临床管理程序的一部分,在研究和临床实践中均应监测血压测量的质量。

相似文献

1
Selective recording in blood pressure readings may increase subsequent mortality.血压读数的选择性记录可能会增加随后的死亡率。
QJM. 2002 Sep;95(9):571-7. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/95.9.571.
2
Transiently elevated diastolic blood pressure is associated with a gender-dependent effect on cardiovascular risk.短暂性舒张压升高与心血管风险的性别依赖性效应相关。
J Hum Hypertens. 2005 May;19(5):347-54. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001825.
3
Terminal digit bias in a specialty hypertension faculty practice.专科高血压诊疗机构中的末位数字偏倚
J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Dec;17(12):819-22. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001625.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of manual office blood pressure measurement in ambulatory hypertensive patients in Korea.韩国动态高血压患者诊室手动血压测量的诊断准确性
Korean J Intern Med. 2018 Jan;33(1):113-120. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2016.161. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
5
Elevated blood pressure at the first measurement predicts cardiovascular disease independently from the subsequent second reading in men, but not in women.首次测量时血压升高可独立预测男性的心血管疾病,而与女性的后续第二次读数无关。
Clin Exp Hypertens. 2015;37(1):39-44. doi: 10.3109/10641963.2014.897720. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
6
The value of ambulatory blood pressure in older adults: the Dublin outcome study.老年人动态血压的价值:都柏林结果研究
Age Ageing. 2008 Mar;37(2):201-6. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afm193.
7
Impact of transiently elevated diastolic pressure on cause of death: 29-year follow-up from the General Practice Hypertension Study Group.短暂性舒张压升高对死亡原因的影响:普通科医生高血压研究组 29 年随访研究。
J Hypertens. 2013 Jan;31(1):71-6. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835a4dd8.
8
Association of hypertension cut-off values with 10-year cardiovascular mortality and clinical consequences: a real-world perspective from the prospective MONICA/KORA study.高血压截断值与 10 年心血管死亡率及临床后果的关系:来自前瞻性 MONICA/KORA 研究的真实世界观察。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Mar 1;40(9):732-738. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy694.
9
Proposal of reference values for home blood pressure measurement: prognostic criteria based on a prospective observation of the general population in Ohasama, Japan.家庭血压测量参考值的建议:基于对日本大岛市普通人群的前瞻性观察得出的预后标准。
Am J Hypertens. 1997 Apr;10(4 Pt 1):409-18.
10
Who's really hypertensive?--Quality control issues in the assessment of blood pressure for randomized trials.谁是真正的高血压患者?——随机试验中血压评估的质量控制问题
Blood Press. 2005;14(3):133-8. doi: 10.1080/08037050510034194.

引用本文的文献

1
Unraveling the Implications of Digit Bias in Digital Health - A Literature Review.解读数字健康中数字偏差的影响——文献综述
Intern Med. 2025 Jul 15;64(14):2090-2099. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.4666-24. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
2
Improving cardiovascular control in a hypertensive population in primary care. Results from a staff training intervention.改善初级保健中高血压人群的心血管控制。一项员工培训干预的结果。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024 Jun;42(2):347-354. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2326470. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
3
The quality of vital signs measurements and value preferences in electronic medical records varies by hospital, specialty, and patient demographics.
生命体征测量和电子病历中的价值偏好的质量因医院、专业和患者人口统计学特征而异。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 8;13(1):3858. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30691-z.
4
Terminal Digit Preference in Pulmonary Hypertension Endpoints.肺动脉高压终点指标中的末位数字偏好
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Jun 15;205(12):1482-1485. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202108-2015LE.
5
Digit Preference in Office Blood Pressure Measurements, United States 2015-2019.2015-2019 年美国诊室血压测量中的数字偏好。
Am J Hypertens. 2021 May 22;34(5):521-530. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpaa196.
6
Antihypertensive treatment and blood pressure trends among South African adults: A repeated cross-sectional analysis of a population panel survey.南非成年人的降压治疗和血压趋势:一项人口面板调查的重复横断面分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 1;13(8):e0200606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200606. eCollection 2018.
7
Sources of inaccuracy in the measurement of adult patients' resting blood pressure in clinical settings: a systematic review.临床环境中成年患者静息血压测量不准确的来源:一项系统综述
J Hypertens. 2017 Mar;35(3):421-441. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001197.
8
Inter-Arm Difference in Brachial Blood Pressure in the General Population of Koreans.韩国普通人群肱动脉血压的双臂差异
Korean Circ J. 2016 May;46(3):374-83. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2016.46.3.374. Epub 2016 May 3.
9
Prevalence of pseudoresistant hypertension due to inaccurate blood pressure measurement.因血压测量不准确导致的假性难治性高血压的患病率。
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2016 Jun;10(6):493-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2016.03.186. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
10
Manual or automated sphygmomanometer? A historical cohort to quantify measurement bias in blood pressure recording.手动还是自动血压计?一项用于量化血压记录中测量偏差的历史性队列研究。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014 Oct;16(10):716-21. doi: 10.1111/jch.12400. Epub 2014 Sep 8.