• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用可靠变化指数评估SF-36结果的临床意义。

Use of the reliable change index to evaluate clinical significance in SF-36 outcomes.

作者信息

Ferguson Robert J, Robinson Amy B, Splaine Mark

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Dartmouth Medical School, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2002 Sep;11(6):509-16. doi: 10.1023/a:1016350431190.

DOI:10.1023/a:1016350431190
PMID:12206571
Abstract

The SF-36 Health Survey is the most widely used self-report measure of functional health. It is commonly used in both randomized controlled trials (RCT) and non-controlled evaluation of medical or other health services. However, determining a clinically significant change in SF-36 outcomes from pre-to-post-intervention, in contrast to statistically significant differences, is often not a focus of medical outcomes research. We propose use of the Reliable Change Index (RCI) in combination with SF-36 norms as one method for researchers, provider groups, and health care policy makers to determine clinically significant healthcare outcomes when the SF-36 is used as a primary measure. The RCI is a statistic that determines the magnitude of change score necessary of a given self-report measure to be considered statistically reliable. The RCI has been used to determine clinically significant change in mental health and behavioral medicine outcomes research, but is not widely applied to medical outcomes research. A usable table of RCIs for the SF-36 has been calculated and is presented. Instruction and a case illustration of how to use the RCI table is also provided. Finally, limitations and cautionary guidelines on using SF-36 norms and the RCI to determine clinically significant outcome are discussed.

摘要

SF-36健康调查是功能健康方面使用最广泛的自我报告测量工具。它常用于随机对照试验(RCT)以及对医疗或其他健康服务的非对照评估中。然而,与具有统计学意义的差异相比,确定干预前后SF-36结果的临床显著变化往往并非医学结果研究的重点。我们建议将可靠变化指数(RCI)与SF-36常模结合使用,作为研究人员、医疗服务提供方和医疗保健政策制定者在将SF-36用作主要测量工具时确定具有临床意义的医疗保健结果的一种方法。RCI是一种统计量,用于确定给定自我报告测量工具中被视为具有统计可靠性所需的变化分数大小。RCI已被用于确定心理健康和行为医学结果研究中的临床显著变化,但尚未广泛应用于医学结果研究。本文计算并给出了SF-36的可用RCI表格。还提供了如何使用RCI表格的说明和案例示例。最后,讨论了使用SF-36常模和RCI来确定具有临床意义结果的局限性及警示指南。

相似文献

1
Use of the reliable change index to evaluate clinical significance in SF-36 outcomes.使用可靠变化指数评估SF-36结果的临床意义。
Qual Life Res. 2002 Sep;11(6):509-16. doi: 10.1023/a:1016350431190.
2
The SF-36 Health Survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: relative validity of scales in relation to clinical measures of arthritis severity.作为骨关节炎和类风湿关节炎患者临床试验通用结局指标的SF-36健康调查:量表相对于关节炎严重程度临床测量指标的相对效度。
Med Care. 1999 May;37(5 Suppl):MS23-39. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199905001-00003.
3
The SF-36 Health Survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and score reliability.SF-36健康调查作为骨关节炎和类风湿关节炎患者临床试验中的通用结局指标:数据质量、量表假设和得分可靠性测试
Med Care. 1999 May;37(5 Suppl):MS10-22. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199905001-00002.
4
Do the SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF measure the same constructs? Evidence from the Taiwan population*.SF-36量表和世界卫生组织生存质量简表(WHOQOL-BREF)测量的是相同的概念吗?来自台湾人群的证据*
Qual Life Res. 2006 Feb;15(1):15-24. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-8486-9.
5
Responsiveness of the SF-36 and the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index in a systemic sclerosis clinical trial.SF-36量表与健康评估问卷残疾指数在系统性硬化症临床试验中的反应性
J Rheumatol. 2005 May;32(5):832-40.
6
The SF-36 Arthritis-Specific Health Index (ASHI): II. Tests of validity in four clinical trials.SF-36关节炎特异性健康指数(ASHI):II. 四项临床试验中的效度测试。
Med Care. 1999 May;37(5 Suppl):MS51-60. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199905001-00005.
7
[Health-related quality of life assessment in depression after low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation].[低频重复经颅磁刺激治疗后抑郁症患者的健康相关生活质量评估]
Encephale. 2014 Feb;40(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
8
Measuring clinically meaningful change following mental health treatment.衡量心理健康治疗后的临床意义变化。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2007 Jul;34(3):272-89. doi: 10.1007/s11414-007-9066-2. Epub 2007 May 30.
9
Patient-reported functional health and well-being outcomes with drug therapy: a systematic review of randomized trials using the SF-36 health survey.药物治疗对患者报告的功能健康和幸福感的影响:使用 SF-36 健康调查的随机试验系统评价。
Med Care. 2014 May;52(5):439-45. doi: 10.1097/MLR.000000000000010311.
10
Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum?测试最小临床重要差异:共识还是难题?
Spine J. 2010 Apr;10(4):321-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.10.015.

引用本文的文献

1
Vaginal lasers for treating stress urinary incontinence in women.用于治疗女性压力性尿失禁的阴道激光
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 25;7(7):CD013643. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013643.pub2.
2
Exploring Biases of Large Language Models in the Field of Mental Health: Comparative Questionnaire Study of the Effect of Gender and Sexual Orientation in Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia Nervosa Case Vignettes.探索大语言模型在心理健康领域的偏差:神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症病例 vignettes 中性别和性取向影响的比较问卷调查研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Mar 20;12:e57986. doi: 10.2196/57986.
3
Changes in health, lifestyle, and wellbeing of children with type 1 diabetes and their parents during the pandemic.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying meaningful intra-individual change standards for health-related quality of life measures.确定与健康相关的生活质量测量中有意义的个体内变化标准。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2000 Feb;6(1):39-49. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00238.x.
2
Methods for defining and determining the clinical significance of treatment effects: description, application, and alternatives.定义和确定治疗效果临床意义的方法:描述、应用及替代方法
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Jun;67(3):300-7. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.67.3.300.
3
Clinical significance.临床意义。
疫情期间 1 型糖尿病患儿及其父母的健康、生活方式和幸福感的变化。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Oct 26;12(1):593. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02102-z.
4
Efficacy of a cognitive-behavioral digital therapeutic on psychosocial outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis: randomized controlled trial.认知行为数字疗法对类风湿关节炎心理社会结局的疗效:随机对照试验
Npj Ment Health Res. 2024 Sep 3;3(1):41. doi: 10.1038/s44184-024-00085-8.
5
Detecting and Predicting Cognitive Decline in Individuals with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Longitudinal Telephone-Based Study.检测和预测创伤性脑损伤个体的认知衰退:一项基于电话随访的纵向研究。
J Neurotrauma. 2024 Aug;41(15-16):1937-1947. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0589. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
6
Peace of mind: Promoting psychological growth and reducing the suffering of combat veterans.内心安宁:促进心理成长并减轻退伍军人的痛苦。
Mil Psychol. 2022 Mar 16;34(6):668-678. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2022.2044119. eCollection 2022.
7
Cultural adaptations of third-wave psychotherapies in Gulf Cooperation Council countries: A systematic review.海湾合作委员会国家中第三波心理疗法的文化适应性:系统评价。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2024 Apr;61(2):209-228. doi: 10.1177/13634615241227691. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
8
Establishing the Minimally Important Difference for the KOOS-Joint Replacement and PROMIS Global-10 in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty.确定全膝关节置换术后患者膝关节损伤与骨关节炎疗效评分-关节置换版(KOOS-Joint Replacement)和患者报告结果测量信息系统全球简表10项(PROMIS Global-10)的最小重要差异。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Feb 2;12(2):23259671231218260. doi: 10.1177/23259671231218260. eCollection 2024 Feb.
9
Effect of a single one-hour teaching session about environmental pollutants and climate change on the understanding and behavioral choices of adolescents: The BREATHE pilot randomized controlled trial.关于环境污染物和气候变化对青少年理解和行为选择影响的单次一小时教学课程的效果:BREATHE 初步随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 27;18(11):e0291199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291199. eCollection 2023.
10
Does social cognition change? Evidence after 4 years from the Italian Network for Research on Psychoses.社会认知是否会发生变化?意大利精神病学研究网络 4 年后的证据。
Eur Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 11;66(1):e10. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2356.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Jun;67(3):283-4.
4
Monitoring health outcomes among patients with arthritis using the SF-36 Health Survey: overview.使用SF-36健康调查监测关节炎患者的健康状况:概述
Med Care. 1999 May;37(5 Suppl):MS1-9. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199905001-00001.
5
Outcomes research: measuring the end results of health care.结果研究:衡量医疗保健的最终结果。
Science. 1998 Oct 9;282(5387):245-6. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5387.245.
6
The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups.医学结局研究36项简明健康调查(SF - 36):III. 不同患者群体的数据质量、量表假设及信度测试
Med Care. 1994 Jan;32(1):40-66. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199401000-00004.
7
Patients at risk: health reform and risk adjustment.风险患者:医疗改革与风险调整
Health Aff (Millwood). 1994 Spring;13(1):132-46. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.13.1.132.
8
The status of health assessment 1994.1994年健康评估状况
Annu Rev Public Health. 1995;16:327-54. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.16.050195.001551.
9
Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?临床实践中的个体患者监测:现有的健康状况调查是否足够?
Qual Life Res. 1995 Aug;4(4):293-307. doi: 10.1007/BF01593882.
10
Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: description of the COOP Chart method and preliminary findings.常规临床实践中的功能评估:COOP图表法的描述及初步结果
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40 Suppl 1:55S-69S. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9681(87)80033-4.