Jafarey Aamir M
Department of Surgery, Ziauddin Medical University, St. 4/B, Block 6, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2002 Jul;8(3):353-62. doi: 10.1007/s11948-002-0055-9.
Health research for progress in the control and conquest of disease afflicting man is unquestionable. Concerns arise when motives other than the advancement of scientific knowledge and benefit for individuals and society are the driving force behind clinical trials. These conflicts of interests become even more pronounced when dealing with populations rendered vulnerable by virtue of poverty and ignorance. South Asia with its teeming millions represents one such region. This essay examines the reasons that make this population vulnerable to exploitation. Informed consent in the process of research is an area where such conflicts are prone to arise. In order to ensure that conflicting interests of researchers and funding agencies are kept in check, the processes of informed consent and ethical review of research need to be strengthened. Suggestions are put forward to modify the consent process to match the needs of South Asia and to strengthen the ethical review process for safeguarding the rights of the study subjects. But perhaps the most important safeguard against exploitation is the virtuous researcher himself with noble intentions.
为在控制和征服折磨人类的疾病方面取得进展而进行健康研究是毋庸置疑的。当临床试验背后的驱动力不是科学知识的进步以及对个人和社会的益处,而是其他动机时,问题就出现了。当涉及因贫困和无知而变得脆弱的人群时,这些利益冲突就变得更加明显。拥有数以百万计人口的南亚就是这样一个地区。本文探讨了使该人群易受剥削的原因。研究过程中的知情同意是此类冲突容易出现的一个领域。为确保研究人员和资助机构的利益冲突得到控制,需要加强知情同意和研究伦理审查程序。本文提出了修改同意程序以适应南亚需求的建议,并加强伦理审查程序以保障研究对象的权利。但或许防止剥削的最重要保障是怀有高尚意图的品德高尚的研究人员自身。