Kishi Misa
Department of Population and International Health, Harvard School of Public Health Food, USA.
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2002 Jul-Sep;8(3):175-81. doi: 10.1179/107735202800338885.
As part of an evaluation study of the impacts of the Indonesian integrated pest management (IPM) Farmer Field Schools on farmers' health, focus group discussions were conducted with rice farmers who grew shallots in rotation. Farmers who had previously participated in IPM rice field schools and who were at the time participating in IPM shallot field schools were compared with farmers who had had no experience with IPM methods. The study found that farmers' knowledge concerning the health dangers of pesticides is not sufficient to change their behaviors. Their overriding concern is crop damage that leads to economic loss, not health. IPM field-school training offers farmers a viable alternative by concretely demonstrating the health, agricultural, environmental, and economic advantages of eliminating unnecessary pesticide use. If public health professionals aim to change behaviors through interventions, they must employ appropriate methods, meet the community's priorities and values, and offer feasible alternatives.
作为印度尼西亚病虫害综合防治农民田间学校对农民健康影响评估研究的一部分,对轮作种植葱的稻农进行了焦点小组讨论。将此前参加过病虫害综合防治稻田学校且当时正在参加病虫害综合防治葱田学校的农民与没有病虫害综合防治方法经验的农民进行了比较。研究发现,农民对农药健康危害的了解不足以改变他们的行为。他们最关心的是导致经济损失的作物损害,而非健康。病虫害综合防治田间学校培训通过具体展示消除不必要农药使用在健康、农业、环境和经济方面的优势,为农民提供了一个可行的选择。如果公共卫生专业人员旨在通过干预措施改变行为,他们必须采用适当的方法,满足社区的优先事项和价值观,并提供可行的选择。