Education and debate: Deaf lesbians, "designer disability," and the future of medicine.
作者信息
Savulescu Julian
机构信息
Oxford Centre for Applied Ethics, Oxford OX1 1PT, UK.
出版信息
BMJ. 2002 Oct 5;325(7367):771-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7367.771.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Education and debate: Deaf lesbians, "designer disability," and the future of medicine.
BMJ. 2002 Oct 5;325(7367):771-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7367.771.
2
Designing deaf babies and the question of disability.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2005 Summer;10(3):311-5. doi: 10.1093/deafed/eni031. Epub 2005 Apr 27.
3
Deafness, culture, and choice.
J Med Ethics. 2002 Oct;28(5):284-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.5.284.
4
Wanting babies like themselves, some parents choose genetic defects.
N Y Times Web. 2006 Dec 5:F5, F8.
5
Reproductive genetic technologies. Exploring ethical and policy implications.
AWHONN Lifelines. 2000 Oct-Nov;4(5):33-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6356.2000.tb01206.x.
6
Lesbian couple create a child who is deaf like them.
J Med Ethics. 2002 Oct;28(5):283. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.5.283.
7
Genetic technology: a threat to deafness.
Med Health Care Philos. 1998;1(3):209-15. doi: 10.1023/a:1009960924838.
8
Controversy over deliberate conception of deaf child.
Lancet. 2002 Apr 13;359(9314):1315. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08322-8.
9
People with partial hearing need to seek hearing potential.
BMJ. 2002 Dec 14;325(7377):1423. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7377.1423/a.
10
Are attempts to have impaired children justifiable?
J Med Ethics. 2002 Oct;28(5):286-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.5.286.
引用本文的文献
1
The Ongoing Challenges of Hearing Loss: Stigma, Socio-Cultural Differences, and Accessibility Barriers.
Audiol Res. 2025 Apr 24;15(3):46. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15030046.
2
Discussions on Human Enhancement Meet Science: A Quantitative Analysis.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2025 Feb 5;31(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s11948-025-00531-6.
3
Reasons and Reproduction: Gene Editing and Genetic Selection.
Am J Bioeth. 2024 Aug;24(8):9-19. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2250288. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
4
The Ethics of Translational Audiology.
Audiol Res. 2022 May 13;12(3):273-280. doi: 10.3390/audiolres12030028.
5
He Jiankui´s gene-editing experiment and the non-identity problem.
Bioethics. 2021 Jul;35(6):563-573. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12878. Epub 2021 May 5.
6
Gene editing and disabled people: a response to Felicity Boardman.
J Community Genet. 2020 Jul;11(3):241-243. doi: 10.1007/s12687-020-00460-w. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
7
Drawing the line on in vitro gametogenesis.
Bioethics. 2020 Jan;34(1):123-134. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12679. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
8
Is it ever morally permissible to select for deafness in one's child?
Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Mar;23(1):3-15. doi: 10.1007/s11019-019-09922-6.
9
Abortion for fetal defects: two current arguments.
Med Health Care Philos. 2017 Sep;20(3):447-450. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9765-2.
10
Queerin' the PGD clinic : human enhancement and the future of bodily diversity.
J Med Humanit. 2013 Jun;34(2):177-96. doi: 10.1007/s10912-013-9223-y.
本文引用的文献
1
Lesbian couple create a child who is deaf like them.
J Med Ethics. 2002 Oct;28(5):283. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.5.283.
2
Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children.
Bioethics. 2001 Oct;15(5-6):413-26. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00251.
3
Ethical issues in cochlear implant surgery: an exploration into disease, disability, and the best interests of the child.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1997 Sep;7(3):231-51. doi: 10.1353/ken.1997.0024.
4
Deaf culture, cochlear implants, and elective disability.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1998 Jul-Aug;28(4):6-14.
5
Attitudes of deaf adults toward genetic testing for hereditary deafness.
Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Oct;63(4):1175-80. doi: 10.1086/302060.
Zotero 插件