• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估肺移植患者问卷的信度和效度。

Evaluating the reliability and validity of the Questionnaire for Lung Transplant Patients.

作者信息

De Vito Dabbs Annette, Hoffman Leslie A, Dauber James H, Zullo Thomas, Iacono Aldo T

机构信息

Department of Acute/Tertiary Care, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa., USA.

出版信息

Prog Transplant. 2002 Sep;12(3):191-8; quiz 199-200. doi: 10.1177/152692480201200307.

DOI:10.1177/152692480201200307
PMID:12371045
Abstract

CONTEXT

The Questionnaire for Lung Transplant Patients was designed for clinical use by the pulmonary transplant team in the routine evaluation of lung transplant recipients. Using the self-administered questionnaire, recipients check symptoms that they have had since their last evaluation and rate their shortness of breath, cough, and activity tolerance.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the questionnaire meets reliability and validity standards for empirical measurement.

METHODS

Demographics and disease-severity characteristics were examined in a cross-sectional survey of 37 recipients. Test-retest and intraclass correlation methods were used to estimate stability, and the Cronbach alpha was used to estimate internal consistency. Criterion validity was examined by using The Modified Symptom Frequency/Symptom Distress Scale, Functional Performance Inventory, and visual analog scales for cough and shortness of breath as criterion measures. Construct validity was examined to assess the predicted negative correlation between symptoms and functional performance.

RESULTS

The questionnaire and its subscales were internally consistent (Cronbach alpha = 0.82, 0.76, 0.80, and 0.96), and the questionnaire was stable (r = 0.70) and reliable (intraclass correlations = 0.80 and 0.90). Significant correlations were found between the questionnaire and all criterion measures (r = 0.50-0.93). Significant correlations in the predicted negative direction were found between the respiratory subscale and functional performance (r = -0.51) and between cough (r = -0.51) and shortness of breath (r = -0.68) ratings and functional performance.

CONCLUSIONS

The Questionnaire for Lung Transplant Patients is reliable and valid, and it provides scientifically sound information for clinical and empirical evaluation of symptoms and their effects on activity tolerance after lung transplantation.

摘要

背景

肺移植患者问卷是由肺移植团队设计,用于在肺移植受者的常规评估中进行临床使用。通过自行填写问卷,受者勾选自上次评估以来出现的症状,并对其呼吸急促、咳嗽和活动耐量进行评分。

目的

确定该问卷是否符合实证测量的信度和效度标准。

方法

在对37名受者的横断面调查中检查人口统计学和疾病严重程度特征。采用重测法和组内相关方法估计稳定性,使用克朗巴哈系数估计内部一致性。通过使用改良症状频率/症状困扰量表、功能表现量表以及咳嗽和呼吸急促的视觉模拟量表作为标准测量来检验效标效度。检验结构效度以评估症状与功能表现之间预测的负相关。

结果

问卷及其子量表具有内部一致性(克朗巴哈系数分别为0.82、0.76、0.80和0.96),问卷具有稳定性(r = 0.70)和可靠性(组内相关系数分别为0.80和0.90)。问卷与所有标准测量之间均发现显著相关性(r = 0.50 - 0.93)。在呼吸子量表与功能表现之间(r = -0.51)以及咳嗽评分(r = -0.51)和呼吸急促评分(r = -0.68)与功能表现之间均发现了预测的负向显著相关性。

结论

肺移植患者问卷可靠且有效,它为肺移植后症状及其对活动耐量影响的临床和实证评估提供了科学合理的信息。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the reliability and validity of the Questionnaire for Lung Transplant Patients.评估肺移植患者问卷的信度和效度。
Prog Transplant. 2002 Sep;12(3):191-8; quiz 199-200. doi: 10.1177/152692480201200307.
2
Validation and refinement of the Questionnaire for Lung Transplant Patients.肺移植患者问卷的验证与完善
Prog Transplant. 2004 Dec;14(4):338-45. doi: 10.1177/152692480401400409.
3
Development and psychometric properties of the Pulmonary-specific Quality-of-Life Scale in lung transplant patients.肺移植患者肺部特异性生活质量量表的编制及心理测量学特性
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Aug;34(8):1058-65. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
4
Evaluation of the electronic version of the questionnaire for lung transplant patients.肺移植患者问卷电子版的评估
Prog Transplant. 2007 Mar;17(1):29-35. doi: 10.1177/152692480701700104.
5
Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Reliability, and Validity of the Persian Version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire for Iranian People With Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain.伊朗非特异性慢性颈痛人群应对策略问卷波斯文版的验证性因子分析、信度和效度。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021 Jan;44(1):72-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
6
A longitudinal study of patients' symptoms before and during the first year after lung transplantation.肺移植后第一年前后患者症状的纵向研究。
Clin Transplant. 2012 Nov-Dec;26(6):E576-89. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12002. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
7
Reliability and validity of simplified Chinese version of Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire for patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.瑞士腰椎管狭窄症问卷简体中文版对退变性腰椎管狭窄症患者的信度和效度
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 May 1;39(10):820-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000273.
8
Reliability and construct validity of self-report questionnaires for patients with pelvic girdle pain.骨盆带疼痛患者自评问卷的信度和结构效度。
Phys Ther. 2012 Jan;92(1):111-23. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110076. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
9
Validity and reliability of the Modified Manchester Health Questionnaire in assessing patients with fecal incontinence.改良版曼彻斯特健康问卷在评估大便失禁患者中的效度和信度。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Feb;48(2):323-31; discussion 331-4. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0899-y.
10
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire.日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷土耳其语版本的跨文化适应、信度和效度
J Orthop Sci. 2016 May;21(3):295-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The Association Between Patient-Level Factors and Physical Function in Lung Transplant Recipients.肺移植受者个体水平因素与身体功能之间的关联
Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2024 Oct;35(4):135-143. doi: 10.1097/cpt.0000000000000253.
2
Design of Lung Transplant Go (LTGO): A randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of a telerehabilitation behavioral exercise intervention to improve physical activity, physical function, and blood pressure control after lung transplantation.肺移植Go(LTGO)设计:一项随机对照试验,评估远程康复行为运动干预对改善肺移植后身体活动、身体功能和血压控制的疗效。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Feb 28;33:101097. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101097. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Daily burdens of recipients and family caregivers after lung transplant.
肺移植后受者及家庭照顾者的日常负担
Prog Transplant. 2012 Mar;22(1):41-7; quiz 48. doi: 10.7182/pit2012815.
4
Development of a remote monitoring satisfaction survey and its use in a clinical trial with lung transplant recipients.远程监测满意度调查问卷的开发及其在肺移植受者临床试验中的应用。
J Telemed Telecare. 2012 Jan;18(1):42-6. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2011.110413. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
5
Measuring patient-reported outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients: an overview of instruments developed to date.测量实体器官移植受者的患者报告结局:迄今开发的工具概述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(4):269-86. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725040-00002.