Cleemput Irina, Dobbels Fabienne
Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE), Brussels, Belgium.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(4):269-86. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725040-00002.
Improvements in organ preservation methods, immunosuppressive regimens and general post-transplant care have resulted in an increased life expectancy and a continually decreasing morbidity after solid organ transplantation. As attention gradually moves towards improving subjective patient outcomes, the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) thus becomes increasingly important in post-transplant patient management. This paper provides a brief systematic overview of the transplant-specific PRO measures, and their psychometric properties, developed and used in solid organ transplant recipients to date. PRO measures may focus on or encompass different aspects of life relevant to organ transplant patients: overall quality of life (QOL), physical, psychological and social functioning, and adherence. Overall QOL can be measured using transplant-specific or generic QOL instruments, or a combination of both. In general, very little information is available on the psychometric properties of PRO measures, and there is no gold standard for PRO measurement. Transplant-specific and generic PRO instruments are complementary. Generic instruments will continue to be important for economic evaluations, but transplant-specific instruments may be more useful for patient management purposes, as they are generally more sensitive to small but clinically relevant changes in outcomes in transplant populations.
器官保存方法、免疫抑制方案以及移植后一般护理的改进,使得实体器官移植后的预期寿命延长,发病率持续降低。随着关注点逐渐转向改善患者的主观预后,患者报告结局测量指标(PROs)在移植后患者管理中的应用变得越来越重要。本文简要系统地概述了迄今为止在实体器官移植受者中开发和使用的特定于移植的PRO测量指标及其心理测量特性。PRO测量指标可能侧重于或涵盖与器官移植患者相关的生活的不同方面:总体生活质量(QOL)、身体、心理和社会功能以及依从性。总体生活质量可以使用特定于移植的或通用的生活质量工具进行测量,或者两者结合使用。一般来说,关于PRO测量指标心理测量特性的信息非常少,并且PRO测量没有金标准。特定于移植的和通用的PRO工具是互补的。通用工具对于经济评估将继续很重要,但特定于移植的工具可能对患者管理目的更有用,因为它们通常对移植人群结局中微小但具有临床相关性的变化更敏感。