Suppr超能文献

两种耦合程序下,实际耳到耦合器差值预测随年龄的变化情况。

Real-ear-to-coupler difference predictions as a function of age for two coupling procedures.

作者信息

Bagatto Marlene P, Scollie Susan D, Seewald Richard C, Moodie K Shane, Hoover Brenda M

机构信息

National Centre for Audiology, University of Western Ontario, London.

出版信息

J Am Acad Audiol. 2002 Sep;13(8):407-15.

Abstract

The predicted real-ear-to-coupler difference (RECD) values currently used in pediatric hearing instrument prescription methods are based on 12-month age range categories and were derived from measures using standard acoustic immittance probe tips. Consequently, the purpose of this study was to develop normative RECD predicted values for foam/acoustic immittance tips and custom earmolds across the age continuum. To this end, RECD data were collected on 392 infants and children (141 with acoustic immittance tips, 251 with earmolds) to develop normative regression equations for use in deriving continuous age predictions of RECDs for foam/acoustic immittance tips and earmolds. Owing to the substantial between-subject variability observed in the data, the predictive equations of RECDs by age (in months) resulted in only gross estimates of RECD values (i.e., within +/- 4.4 dB for 95% of acoustic immittance tip measures; within +/- 5.4 dB in 95% of measures with custom earmolds) across frequency. Thus, it is concluded that the estimates derived from this study should not be used to replace the more precise individual RECD measurements. Relative to previously available normative RECD values for infants and young children, however, the estimates derived through this study provide somewhat more accurate predicted values for use under those circumstances for which individual RECD measurements cannot be made.

摘要

目前儿科听力仪器验配方法中使用的预估真耳-耦合器差值(RECD)值基于12个月的年龄范围类别,并且是通过使用标准声导抗探头获得的测量值推导而来。因此,本研究的目的是针对不同年龄段,制定泡沫/声导抗探头和定制耳模的RECD标准预估值。为此,收集了392名婴幼儿(141名使用声导抗探头,251名使用耳模)的RECD数据,以建立标准回归方程,用于推导泡沫/声导抗探头和耳模的RECD连续年龄预测值。由于数据中观察到显著的个体间差异,按年龄(月龄)得出的RECD预测方程仅能对RECD值进行大致估计(即95%的声导抗探头测量值在±4.4 dB范围内;95%的定制耳模测量值在±5.4 dB范围内)。因此,得出结论,本研究得出的估计值不应替代更精确的个体RECD测量值。然而,相对于之前可得的婴幼儿标准RECD值,本研究得出的估计值在无法进行个体RECD测量的情况下提供了更为准确的预测值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验