Iseli Hans Peter, Wenzel A, Hafezi F, REme C E, Grimm C
Laboratory of Retinal Cell Biology, Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland.
Exp Eye Res. 2002 Oct;75(4):407-13.
A sequence variation in the pigment epithelial protein RPE65 has been shown to correlate with RPE65 protein levels, rhodopsin regeneration kinetics and light damage susceptibility in different mouse strains. Here, we tested whether such a correlation can also be found in rats. We examined four rat strains for RPE65 protein levels and the Rpe65 gene sequence. In two strains, we additionally determined Rpe65 mRNA levels, rhodopsin regeneration and light damage susceptibility (LDS).RPE65 protein levels were higher in Lewis and Brown Norway rats compared to Wistar and Long Evans. The albino strains Wistar and Lewis were investigated further. Lewis had higher Rpe65 mRNA levels than Wistar. Sequence analysis of the coding region of the Rpe65 cDNA revealed no relevant sequence variations in the two strains. Content and regeneration of rhodopsin were comparable in both strains. However, Wistar rats were more susceptible to light damage than Lewis. We conclude that lower RPE65 protein levels in Wistar may have been caused by decreased gene expression and not by a sequence variation as suggested for mice. In rats, RPE65 may not be a limiting factor for rhodopsin regeneration. Since LDS in rats did not directly correlate with RPE65 protein levels and rhodopsin regeneration, other yet unidentified (genetic) factors may account for the susceptibility differences observed in rats.
色素上皮蛋白RPE65中的序列变异已被证明与不同小鼠品系中的RPE65蛋白水平、视紫红质再生动力学和光损伤易感性相关。在此,我们测试了在大鼠中是否也能发现这种相关性。我们检测了四个大鼠品系的RPE65蛋白水平和Rpe65基因序列。在两个品系中,我们还测定了Rpe65 mRNA水平、视紫红质再生和光损伤易感性(LDS)。与Wistar和Long Evans大鼠相比,Lewis和Brown Norway大鼠的RPE65蛋白水平更高。对白化病品系Wistar和Lewis进行了进一步研究。Lewis的Rpe65 mRNA水平高于Wistar。Rpe65 cDNA编码区的序列分析显示这两个品系中没有相关的序列变异。两个品系中视紫红质的含量和再生情况相当。然而,Wistar大鼠比Lewis大鼠更容易受到光损伤。我们得出结论,Wistar大鼠中较低的RPE65蛋白水平可能是由于基因表达降低所致,而非如小鼠那样是由序列变异引起的。在大鼠中,RPE65可能不是视紫红质再生的限制因素。由于大鼠的LDS与RPE65蛋白水平和视紫红质再生没有直接相关性,其他尚未确定的(遗传)因素可能是导致大鼠中观察到的易感性差异的原因。