Duthie Grant M, Young Warren B, Aitken David A
School of Human Movement and Sports Science, University of Ballarat, Mt. Helen, Australia 3350.
J Strength Cond Res. 2002 Nov;16(4):530-8.
The purpose of this investigation was to examine power performance in jump squats when using the complex and contrast training methods. Eleven (n = 11) women participated in a familiarization session and in three randomly ordered testing sessions. One session involved completing sets of power exercises (jump squats) before sets of half squats (traditional method). The second session involved sets of half squats before sets of jump squats (complex method). A third session involved the alternation of sets of half squats and jump squats (contrast method). No significant difference in jump squat performance between each of the training methods was found. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the first set of each session, with the complex method having a significantly lower peak power. Further, there was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in performance changes between the higher and lower strength groups, with the higher strength group having a greater improvement in performance using the contrast training method compared with the traditional method. It was concluded that contrast training is advantageous for increasing power output but only for athletes with relatively high strength levels.
本研究的目的是检验在使用复合训练法和对比训练法时，深蹲跳的力量表现。11名女性参与了一次熟悉训练课程以及三次随机排序的测试课程。其中一次课程是在进行几组半蹲（传统方法）之前先完成几组力量训练（深蹲跳）。第二次课程是在进行几组深蹲跳之前先进行几组半蹲（复合训练法）。第三次课程是半蹲组和深蹲跳组交替进行（对比训练法）。结果发现，各训练方法之间的深蹲跳表现没有显著差异。在每次课程的第一组中存在显著差异（p < 0.05），复合训练法的峰值功率显著更低。此外，较高强度组和较低强度组之间的表现变化存在显著差异（p < 0.05），与传统训练法相比，较高强度组使用对比训练法时的表现提升更大。研究得出结论，对比训练法有利于提高力量输出，但仅对力量水平相对较高的运动员有效。
