• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简易精神状态检查表中的教育程度和性别差异:项目功能差异的影响

Education and sex differences in the mini-mental state examination: effects of differential item functioning.

作者信息

Jones Richard N, Gallo Joseph J

机构信息

Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for Aged Research and Training Institute, Boston, Massachusetts

出版信息

J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002 Nov;57(6):P548-58. doi: 10.1093/geronb/57.6.p548.

DOI:10.1093/geronb/57.6.p548
PMID:12426438
Abstract

Years of completed education is a powerful correlate of performance on mental status assessment. This analysis evaluates differences in cognitive performance attributable to level of education and sex. We analyzed Mini-Mental State Examination responses from a large community sample (Epidemiologic Catchment Area study, N = 8,556), using a structural equation analytic framework grounded in item response theory. Significant sex and education group differential item functioning (DIF) were detected. Those with low education were more likely to err on the first serial subtraction, spell world backwards, repeat phrase, write, name season, and copy design tasks. Women were more likely to err on all serial subtractions, men on spelling and other language tasks. The magnitude of detected DIF was small. Our analyses show that failing to account for DIF results in an approximately 1.6% overestimation of the magnitude of difference in assessed cognition between high- and low-education groups. In contrast, nearly all (95%) of apparent sex differences underlying cognitive impairment are due to DIF. Therefore, item bias does not appear to be a major source of observed differences in cognitive status by educational attainment. Adjustments of total scores that eliminate education group differences are not supported by these results. Our results have implications for future research concerning education and risk for dementia.

摘要

完成学业的年限与精神状态评估表现密切相关。本分析评估了因教育水平和性别导致的认知表现差异。我们使用基于项目反应理论的结构方程分析框架,分析了来自大型社区样本(流行病学集水区研究,N = 8556)的简易精神状态检查表的回答。检测到显著的性别和教育组差异项目功能(DIF)。受教育程度低的人在首项连续减法、倒拼单词、重复短语、书写、说出季节以及复制设计任务上更容易出错。女性在所有连续减法上更容易出错,男性在拼写和其他语言任务上更容易出错。检测到的DIF幅度较小。我们的分析表明,不考虑DIF会导致对高学历和低学历群体评估认知差异幅度的高估约1.6%。相比之下,认知障碍背后几乎所有(95%)明显的性别差异都归因于DIF。因此,项目偏差似乎不是观察到的认知状态因教育程度不同而产生差异的主要来源。这些结果不支持消除教育组差异的总分调整。我们的结果对未来关于教育和痴呆风险的研究具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
Education and sex differences in the mini-mental state examination: effects of differential item functioning.简易精神状态检查表中的教育程度和性别差异:项目功能差异的影响
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002 Nov;57(6):P548-58. doi: 10.1093/geronb/57.6.p548.
2
Differential item functioning related to education and age in the Italian version of the Mini-mental State Examination.意大利版简易精神状态检查表中与教育程度和年龄相关的项目功能差异
Int Psychogeriatr. 2006 Sep;18(3):505-15. doi: 10.1017/S1041610205002978. Epub 2006 Feb 15.
3
Differential item functioning (DIF) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Overview, sample, and issues of translation.项目功能差异(DIF)与简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)。概述、样本及翻译问题。
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S95-S106. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245181.96133.db.
4
Japanese-English language equivalence of the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument among Japanese-Americans.日裔美国人中认知能力筛查工具的日英语言等效性。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2009 Feb;21(1):129-37. doi: 10.1017/S1041610208007862. Epub 2008 Oct 24.
5
The relation of education and gender on the attention items of the Mini-Mental State Examination in Spanish speaking Hispanic elders.教育和性别对说西班牙语的西班牙裔老年人简易精神状态检查表注意力项目的影响
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Oct;21(7):677-86. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.08.001. Epub 2006 Sep 11.
6
Identification of measurement differences between English and Spanish language versions of the Mini-Mental State Examination. Detecting differential item functioning using MIMIC modeling.《简易精神状态检查表》英文和西班牙文版本测量差异的识别。使用MIMIC模型检测项目功能差异。
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S124-33. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245250.50114.0f.
7
Education bias in the mini-mental state examination.简易精神状态检查表中的教育偏差。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2001 Sep;13(3):299-310. doi: 10.1017/s1041610201007694.
8
Item and scale differential functioning of the Mini-Mental State Exam assessed using the Differential Item and Test Functioning (DFIT) Framework.使用差异项目与测验功能(DFIT)框架评估简易精神状态检查表的项目与量表差异功能。
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S143-51. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245141.70946.29.
9
Mini-Mental Status Examination: mixed Rasch model item analysis derived two different cognitive dimensions of the MMSE.简易精神状态检查表:混合拉施模型项目分析得出了简易精神状态检查表的两个不同认知维度。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Mar;60(3):268-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.007. Epub 2006 Aug 10.
10
Differential item functioning analysis with ordinal logistic regression techniques. DIFdetect and difwithpar.使用有序逻辑回归技术进行项目功能差异分析。DIFdetect和difwithpar。
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S115-23. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245183.28384.ed.

引用本文的文献

1
Conversion between the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale and Mini-Mental State Examination test scores in majority and minority populations.罗文普遍痴呆评估量表与简易精神状态检查在多数族裔和少数族裔人群中的转换。
Brain Behav. 2024 Sep;14(9):e3650. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3650.
2
Assessing cognitive decline in the aging brain: lessons from rodent and human studies.评估衰老大脑中的认知衰退:来自啮齿动物和人类研究的经验教训。
NPJ Aging. 2023 Oct 19;9(1):23. doi: 10.1038/s41514-023-00120-6.
3
Delirium in older hospitalized patients-A prospective analysis of the detailed course of delirium in geriatric inpatients.
老年住院患者的谵妄-老年住院患者谵妄详细过程的前瞻性分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 16;18(3):e0279763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279763. eCollection 2023.
4
Validation of the cross-cultural dementia screening test in Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease.跨文化痴呆筛查测试在阿尔茨海默病和帕金森病中的验证
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 4;13:1043721. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1043721. eCollection 2022.
5
The application of cross-sectionally derived dementia algorithms to longitudinal data in risk factor analyses.将基于横断面数据的痴呆算法应用于风险因素分析中的纵向数据。
Ann Epidemiol. 2023 Jan;77:78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2022.11.006. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
6
Measurement of Prevalent Versus Incident Dementia Cases in Epidemiologic Studies.在流行病学研究中测量现患病例与新发病例的痴呆症。
Am J Epidemiol. 2023 Apr 6;192(4):520-534. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac197.
7
Comparison of two cognitive screening measures in a longitudinal sample of youth at-risk for psychosis.两种认知筛查措施在纵向风险精神分裂症青年样本中的比较。
Schizophr Res. 2022 Aug;246:216-224. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2022.06.017. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
8
Cognitive impairment in adult CHD survivors: A pilot study.成年先天性心脏病幸存者的认知障碍:一项初步研究。
Int J Cardiol Congenit Heart Dis. 2021 Dec;6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcchd.2021.100290. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
9
The effect of missing data and imputation on the detection of bias in cognitive testing using differential item functioning methods.缺失数据和插补对使用差异项目功能方法检测认知测试偏倚的影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Mar 27;22(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01572-2.
10
Scale length does matter: Recommendations for measurement invariance testing with categorical factor analysis and item response theory approaches.尺度长度确实很重要:类别因素分析和项目反应理论方法的测量不变性检验建议。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Oct;54(5):2114-2145. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01690-7. Epub 2021 Dec 15.