• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利版简易精神状态检查表中与教育程度和年龄相关的项目功能差异

Differential item functioning related to education and age in the Italian version of the Mini-mental State Examination.

作者信息

Crane Paul K, Gibbons Laura E, Jolley Lance, van Belle Gerald, Selleri Ricardo, Dalmonte Edoardo, De Ronchi Diana

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.

出版信息

Int Psychogeriatr. 2006 Sep;18(3):505-15. doi: 10.1017/S1041610205002978. Epub 2006 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1017/S1041610205002978
PMID:16478571
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Differential item functioning (DIF) exists when test item responses by members of different demographic groups are statistically different when controlling for ability. DIF may indicate item bias. Our objective was to determine whether items from the Italian Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) had DIF related to educational attainment, age, gender and occupation. We were also interested in exploring the significance of DIF in screening tests.

METHODS

In a two-stage study from Granarolo, Italy, residents over age 61 (n = 495) were evaluated with the Italian MMSE. Those with MMSE scores of 28 or lower were further evaluated for dementia. MMSE results were coded in 10 item bundles. We used ordinal logistic regression to determine whether item bundles had DIF.

RESULTS

Six of the 10 MMSE item bundles had DIF in educational attainment subgroups. Four of these six bundles also had DIF related to age. Items that required literacy were much harder for those with lower educational attainment.

CONCLUSIONS

DIF related to education appeared at as few as 3 years of formal schooling. These findings suggest cautious interpretation of data from studies using the Italian MMSE in populations with heterogeneous educational backgrounds. DIF is especially troublesome for two-stage studies that use screening tests.

摘要

背景

当在控制能力的情况下,不同人口统计学群体的测试项目回答在统计学上存在差异时,就存在项目功能差异(DIF)。DIF可能表明项目存在偏差。我们的目的是确定意大利简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)中的项目是否存在与教育程度、年龄、性别和职业相关的DIF。我们还对探索DIF在筛查测试中的意义感兴趣。

方法

在意大利格拉纳罗洛进行的一项两阶段研究中,对61岁以上的居民(n = 495)进行了意大利MMSE评估。MMSE得分28分及以下的患者进一步接受痴呆症评估。MMSE结果被编码为10个项目组。我们使用有序逻辑回归来确定项目组是否存在DIF。

结果

10个MMSE项目组中有6个在教育程度亚组中存在DIF。这6个组中的4个也存在与年龄相关的DIF。对于教育程度较低的人来说,需要识字能力的项目要难得多。

结论

与教育相关的DIF在仅接受3年正规学校教育的人群中就已出现。这些发现表明,对于在教育背景各异的人群中使用意大利MMSE进行的研究数据,应谨慎解读。对于使用筛查测试的两阶段研究而言,DIF尤其棘手。

相似文献

1
Differential item functioning related to education and age in the Italian version of the Mini-mental State Examination.意大利版简易精神状态检查表中与教育程度和年龄相关的项目功能差异
Int Psychogeriatr. 2006 Sep;18(3):505-15. doi: 10.1017/S1041610205002978. Epub 2006 Feb 15.
2
Japanese-English language equivalence of the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument among Japanese-Americans.日裔美国人中认知能力筛查工具的日英语言等效性。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2009 Feb;21(1):129-37. doi: 10.1017/S1041610208007862. Epub 2008 Oct 24.
3
Differential item functioning (DIF) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Overview, sample, and issues of translation.项目功能差异(DIF)与简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)。概述、样本及翻译问题。
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S95-S106. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245181.96133.db.
4
Occurrence of cognitive impairment and dementia after the age of 60: a population-based study from Northern Italy.60岁后认知障碍和痴呆症的发生情况:一项来自意大利北部的基于人群的研究。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2005;19(2-3):97-105. doi: 10.1159/000082660. Epub 2004 Dec 9.
5
Differential item functioning analysis with ordinal logistic regression techniques. DIFdetect and difwithpar.使用有序逻辑回归技术进行项目功能差异分析。DIFdetect和difwithpar。
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S115-23. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245183.28384.ed.
6
Screening for cognitive impairment among older people in black and minority ethnic groups.对黑人和少数族裔老年人的认知障碍筛查。
Age Ageing. 2004 Sep;33(5):447-52. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afh135. Epub 2004 Jun 24.
7
Cross-cultural comparisons of the Mini-mental State Examination between Japanese and U.S. cohorts.日本和美国队列之间简易精神状态检查表的跨文化比较。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2009 Feb;21(1):113-22. doi: 10.1017/S1041610208007886. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
8
Validation of a French version of an informant-based questionnaire as a screening test for Alzheimer's disease.基于 informant 的问卷法语版本作为阿尔茨海默病筛查测试的验证。
Br J Psychiatry. 1995 Oct;167(4):541-4. doi: 10.1192/bjp.167.4.541.
9
Modern psychometric methods for detection of differential item functioning: application to cognitive assessment measures.用于检测项目功能差异的现代心理测量方法:在认知评估测量中的应用。
Stat Med. 2000;19(11-12):1651-83. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000615/30)19:11/12<1651::aid-sim453>3.0.co;2-h.
10
Mini-Mental Status Examination: mixed Rasch model item analysis derived two different cognitive dimensions of the MMSE.简易精神状态检查表:混合拉施模型项目分析得出了简易精神状态检查表的两个不同认知维度。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Mar;60(3):268-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.007. Epub 2006 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurophysiological and Brain Structural Markers of Cognitive Frailty Differ from Alzheimer's Disease.认知脆弱的神经生理学和脑结构标志物与阿尔茨海默病不同。
J Neurosci. 2022 Feb 16;42(7):1362-1373. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0697-21.2021. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
2
The Impact of Education on Depression Assessment: Differential Item Functioning Analysis.教育对抑郁评估的影响:项目区分功能分析。
Assessment. 2022 Mar;29(2):272-284. doi: 10.1177/1073191120971357. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
3
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Resilience Scale (RS-14): Preliminary results.
中文版复原力量表(RS - 14)的心理测量学特性:初步结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 30;15(10):e0241606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241606. eCollection 2020.
4
DIF in the Spanish Version of the Verbal Selective Reminding Test Using Samples From Hispanics in the United States, Mexicans, and Spaniards.使用来自美国西班牙裔、墨西哥人和西班牙人的样本对西班牙语版言语选择性提醒测试进行差异项目功能分析。
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 13;10:2687. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02687. eCollection 2019.
5
Cognitive Trajectory Changes Over 20 Years Before Dementia Diagnosis: A Large Cohort Study.痴呆症诊断前20年的认知轨迹变化:一项大型队列研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Dec;65(12):2627-2633. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15077. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
6
Measurement Equivalence of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Applied Cognition - General Concerns, Short Forms in Ethnically Diverse Groups.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)应用认知量表在不同种族群体中的测量等效性——一般问题及简表
Psychol Test Assess Model. 2016;58(2):255-307.
7
Effects of Education on Differential Item Functioning on the 15-Item Modified Korean Version of the Boston Naming Test.教育对15项改良版韩语版波士顿命名测验中项目功能差异的影响。
Psychiatry Investig. 2017 Mar;14(2):126-135. doi: 10.4306/pi.2017.14.2.126. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
8
Differential item functioning due to cognitive status does not impact depressive symptom measures in four heterogeneous samples of older adults.在四个不同的老年人样本中,因认知状态导致的项目功能差异不会影响抑郁症状测量。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015 Sep;30(9):911-8. doi: 10.1002/gps.4234. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
9
Extension of an iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression/item response theory approach to detect and account for differential item functioning in longitudinal data.迭代混合有序逻辑回归/项目反应理论方法的扩展,用于检测和处理纵向数据中的项目功能差异。
Psychol Test Assess Model. 2013 Apr 1;55(2):127-147.
10
A comparison of item response theory-based methods for examining differential item functioning in object naming test by language of assessment among older Latinos.基于项目反应理论的方法在老年拉丁裔人群中按评估语言检验物体命名测试中项目功能差异的比较。
Psychol Test Assess Model. 2011 Fall;53(4):440-460.